• @Bytemeister
    link
    09 months ago

    Right, so at this point, you have made assertions without evidence, and when asked to simply reference the evidence, you have failed make even the simplest defense of your claims.

    Therefore, your points regarding my reading ability, blaming you for something, and that I fell into a “trap” by you can be refuted with the same evidentiary threshold.

    If you’d like to continue this discussion, please provide direct evidence that:

    • I have blamed you for something

    • I have fallen for a trap

    • there is a lack of reading comprehension on my part.

    Further discussion without meeting these (very basic) requirements is a tacit admission that any and all of those claims are without merit, and you yourself are trolling and not providing honest discourse.

    The ball is in your court.

    • @Madison420
      link
      19 months ago

      My evidence is the definitions you’ve provided dumb dumb, that’s the trap.

      Again reading comprehension basil exposition, using more words doesn’t actually mean you’re saying anything of value.

      • @Bytemeister
        link
        09 months ago

        This is a tacit admission from @madison420 that their previous statements are unfounded and meaningless.

        • @Madison420
          link
          29 months ago

          There’s that reading comprehension thing again.

          It’s all there, just read the big words and use that smooth fuckin brain for something other then word vomit.

          • @Bytemeister
            link
            09 months ago

            There’s that reading comprehension thing again.

            Another baseless accusation, adding further evidence that @Madison420 is not engaging in good-faith discussion, and tacitly acknowledges that their previous statements are meaningless, because they have been unable to point out any actual shortcomings in my reading comprehension.

            • @Madison420
              link
              19 months ago

              Amusing. Good luck on your lazy trolling endeavors. At least put in enough effort to keep up with the conversation.

              • @Bytemeister
                link
                0
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                At least put in enough effort to keep up with the conversation.

                You’re the one who is at least 4 posts behind, because as of this message, you, @Madison420, have yet to provide any proof for your claims. Without that supporting information, any further communication further emphasizes my position that your claims are empty and without substance. Feel free to quote any point in our conversation that supports your claim, in order to refute my assertation. You could have done it many messages/hours ago, yet here we are.

                Your claims are an empty and worthless, and your refusal to converse in good faith or admit your error is a reflection of your character.

                • @Madison420
                  link
                  29 months ago

                  Sure, don’t let reality intervene, you certainly haven’t yet.

                  • @Bytemeister
                    link
                    0
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Another post, another missed opportunity to make me eat crow. We both know you can’t actually do it, because what you think happened didn’t really happen, which is why you can’t actually find it, quote it, and shove it back in my face.

                    So, they usual again? @Madison420 has (again) failed to provide the slightest shred of actual evidence to support their claims against me. This paints their person in a most unfavorable light.

                    Let me make a prediction. In their next post here, they still won’t even make an attempt to correct this.