• kbal
    link
    fedilink
    29 months ago

    The article seems to confirm what’s been my understanding which is that that pretty much anything beyond “session cookies” or the like is covered, whether or not the data collected gets sold or transferred to anyone else.

    But yes, there are reasons why data gets sold to advertisers as well. Commercial incentives which are strong and predictable. Regulations should not be designed as if they aren’t there.

    • poVoqOP
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      Commercial incentives which are strong and predictable. Regulations should not be designed as if they aren’t there.

      The entire point of the GDPR is to reign in those “commercial incentives” to spy on users for a little extra money from advertisers.

      But I am starting to get the feeling I am trying to argue with someone who makes a living out of spying on users and selling that data to advertisers, which makes this argument moot.

      • kbal
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Nope, I’m not one of them. But I have worked for large companies in the past and therefore have met them.

        The GDPR has done substantial good, not least in just getting people to talk about this sort of thing. But the cookie banners are and always have been ridiculous and a sign of one of its failures. An outright ban on surveillance capitalism business models would suit me better.