Tell me you have no fucking clue about the contents of the constitution or the concept of rule of law without telling me you have no fucking clue about the contents of the constitution or the concept of rule of law.
This is basically saying that states supersede the federal government on border policy, which is patently absurd. You either believe in the rule of law or you don’t. You don’t get to have it both ways. The conversation justices in this case are complete buffoons.
So basically, if Democrats are in office, the Supreme Court has determined the Administrative authority no longer has administrative authority.
Got it.
Administrative authority doesn’t have authority if the administration isn’t administering.
Tell me you have no fucking clue about the contents of the constitution or the concept of rule of law without telling me you have no fucking clue about the contents of the constitution or the concept of rule of law.
Well, if they’re not doing their job, yeah. They don’t get to decide which laws they follow, that’s the job of the legislative branch.
This is basically saying that states supersede the federal government on border policy, which is patently absurd. You either believe in the rule of law or you don’t. You don’t get to have it both ways. The conversation justices in this case are complete buffoons.
BUT WE’RE BEING INVADED!!!
(by moms and children who are immediately requesting asylum and somewhat stressing inadequately funded infrastructure)