Grayox to [email protected] • 10 months agoYeee yeelemmy.mlimagemessage-square353fedilinkarrow-up11.31Karrow-down1131
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1imageYeee yeelemmy.mlGrayox to [email protected] • 10 months agomessage-square353fedilink
minus-squareSybillink-1•10 months ago Have you never heard of the concept of a transitional state? yes. it’s why we split at the second international. i wish you all would give up on the transitional state.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•10 months agoCan you name a large scale anarchist project that wouldn’t qualify as a transitional state?
minus-squareSybillink1•10 months ago large scale this is a setup for a no-true-scotsman. i’ll talk to you about anarchist societies, but i won’t let you define them out of existence.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•10 months agoSorry, are you saying there haven’t been any large scale anarchist projects?
minus-squareSybillink1•10 months agoi’m saying until you define “large scale” you gave your self enough wiggle room to push every scotsman into the sea.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•10 months agoOkay, containing more than 100, 000 people, that work for you?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•10 months agoBecause that gives you generous wiggle room.
minus-squareSybillink0•10 months agoI guess I just don’t understand what you’re getting at…I don’t have a chart of population sizes. I’m just going to say I don’t know, but an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. let’s say, though, that none ever existed. so what?
yes. it’s why we split at the second international. i wish you all would give up on the transitional state.
Can you name a large scale anarchist project that wouldn’t qualify as a transitional state?
this is a setup for a no-true-scotsman. i’ll talk to you about anarchist societies, but i won’t let you define them out of existence.
Sorry, are you saying there haven’t been any large scale anarchist projects?
i’m saying until you define “large scale” you gave your self enough wiggle room to push every scotsman into the sea.
Okay, containing more than 100, 000 people, that work for you?
and why should that be the metric?
Because that gives you generous wiggle room.
I guess I just don’t understand what you’re getting at…I don’t have a chart of population sizes. I’m just going to say I don’t know, but an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
let’s say, though, that none ever existed. so what?