• Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Wikipedia managed to do it on donations only. Federated social media is similar in many ways and I think it’s entirely possible that we may get development and hosting to be funded in a similar fashion.

    • @squid_slime
      link
      English
      218 months ago

      And most open source projects run under this model. I’m leaving if ads appear tbth

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think the lesson that should be beginning to crystallise in people’s minds these days is that we have to pay. If we don’t, we get Facebook, Digg, Reddit, etc. We get inevitable enshitification. I mentioned Wikipedia because I think paying for it has sunk into many people’s minds already. And generally we don’t need everyone to pay. If the ones that can afford to spare a few bucks a month, do, it’ll be enough.

      • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        The more this looks like Reddit the more likely I am to just switch back.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          What are you referring to “looking like Reddit”? And why would you want their API lock-in, paid ads disguised as content, and obvious AI bot posts?

    • @Brkdncr
      link
      English
      -118 months ago

      Wikipedia is different. It’s a lot more static to begin with.

      You need a whale to keep this thing afloat, and if you get a whale, you also have to bend the knee.

      I’d rather see some ads and reasonable employee compensation than relying on a wealthy benefactor.

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        English
        78 months ago

        And yet here we are, years in, Lemmy still growing