• FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    629 months ago

    “was not detected by the authors…”… BULLSHIT.

    The author was chatGPT. At least of that phrase. the claimed-author… used chatGPT. There’s zero justifiable excuse for the author to be totally unaware. they “wrote” it, after all.

    • Turun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      589 months ago

      No shit it’s bullshit. It’s a meme about AI text in a research paper that makes fun of Elsevier by having ChatGPT write an apology template for Elsevier.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      139 months ago

      The scary part is the editors, copyeditors and the reviewers not catching this. If they’re not catching casual LLM wording, how are they to be counted on to make sure the science behind the paper is good and valid?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        They do not include the peer reviewers in their list of people who missed it. Which means that either the peer reviewers did pick it up and for some reason it didn’t get addressed (unlikely) or this was a straight up pay-to-play and whoever runs that particular bit of the racket for Elsevier fucked up.

    • @Hobbes_Dent
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      …was inadvertently outsourced on Fiverr… and people would shit but half the world seems ok with this shit.

      Edit: I learned how to spell Fiverr today.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        109 months ago

        so they just hired a shadow writer. And the shadow writer used chat GPT.

        because that makes the excuse valid, right?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      It wasn’t the authors. Well, not the authors of the paper. It was the author of the publisher’s introduction to the paper.