• @Organichedgehog
    link
    -6
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Here you go, you brainwashed chucklefuck. You think I couldn’t Google every single senator and find accusations levied that aren’t a confession? Now tell me exactly how these are exceptions to your “nO eXcEpTiOnS” braindead take. Literally took 3 seconds to look these up, and you think not a single example exists across the entire political spectrum.

    I also note that you didn’t respond to my example of politicians that broke with trump and levied accusations at him, at the cost of their career. NO EXCEPTIONS DERRRR

    https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/16/politics/john-mccain-rand-paul-rule-19-vladimir-putin/index.html

    https://time.com/5130826/john-mccain-donald-trump-vladimir-putin-fbi/

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna388036

    For the record, I fully expect you to walk this back and tell me how “WELL THESE ARENT THE ACCUSATIONS I MEANT, I MEANT SPECIFICALLY [X]” even though you literally left no room for interpretation, nuance, or exceptions. Which was my exact point, which you clearly do not understand, through the reddit-induced brainwashed fog

    • @nomous
      link
      39 months ago

      Look at this guy over here projecting.

      • @kescusay
        link
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I’m kinda done with him. He said he was done with me, after all.

        It’s too bad, because I’m pretty sure this is down to a combination of misunderstanding hyperbole and misunderstanding exactly who I was talking about.

        The John McCain links are evidence of that, because McCain never hurled unfounded accusations with ironic truths underlying them at anyone.

        If, for example, McCain had embraced birtherism, the fact that he himself was born outside of the United States would have been a textbook example. But McCain had too much integrity to do that, so doesn’t fit the profile of accuser/confessor.

        For the life of me, I don’t get what’s so hard to understand. The formula is simple: Stupid, mendacious accusation == confession about an ironic, underlying truth. No stupid, mendacious accusation? No ironic, underlying truth.

        C’est la vie, I guess.

        • @Organichedgehog
          link
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Now I’d LOOOVE for you to tell me how

          “Every accusation…Every single one. No exceptions.” is the same as “stupid, mendacious accusation”. Cause non-“stupid, mendacious accusations” certainly sounds like the literal definition of an exception to “every accusation…every one”

          Betting you’ll sidestep or not answer tho lol

        • @Organichedgehog
          link
          19 months ago

          The formula is simple: Stupid, mendacious accusation == confession about an ironic, underlying truth. No stupid, mendacious accusation? No ironic, underlying truth.

          Holy shit, introducing nuance? It’s almost like you understand my point and changed your argument to exactly what I suggested it should have been in the first place, but would never admit that you were wrong! Wow, I’m completely shocked!

    • @jpreston2005
      link
      29 months ago

      The OP was being hyperbolic. you’re just being an ass.

      • @Organichedgehog
        link
        -19 months ago

        Repeatedly doubling down on your “100% no exceptions all Republicans are pure evil” is a path to a more divided America and is only one very small step away from calling for violence. I’m ok calling that person a braindead chucklefuck.