In commemoration of the upcoming Transgender Day of Visibility (TDOV), President Joe Biden issued a statement praising trans people’s contributions to society and describing actions his administration has taken to counter transphobic bullying and extremism. Additionally, many members of Biden’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) also issued their own statements affirming that community health depends on supporting trans people too.

“Transgender Americans are part of the fabric of our Nation,” Biden wrote in his statement. “Whether serving their communities or in the military, raising families or running businesses, they help America thrive. They deserve, and are entitled to, the same rights and freedoms as every other American, including the most fundamental freedom to be their true selves.”

  • @UnderpantsWeevil
    link
    598 months ago

    Just tiresome to read “Joe Biden becomes first president to wave a trans flag from the stairs of Air Force One” and then turn the page and read “Florida legislature passes the ‘Install Land Mines In Women’s Restrooms Act’ and funds it to the tune of $40M”

    • @Gradually_Adjusting
      link
      English
      258 months ago

      It’s more than tiresome, it’s a fucking holocaust in motion. I’m just taking the Ws where I can.

      • @Ultragigagigantic
        link
        118 months ago

        Religous fundamentalists setting the stage to seize control of the nation and institute a authoritarian government to carry out a genocide?

        Sounds serious!

        So when are democrats dropping gun control considering this imminent threat?

        Armed queers bash back.

        SocialistRA.org

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        108 months ago

        That word is being abused lately. Trans people aren’t being packed into trains and sent to gas chambers.

        What’s happening to them isn’t ok and laws need to protect their rights like everyone elses, make no mistake about it but conflating it with the Holocaust, doesn’t help the victims make progress. We need to use accurate language to combat the inflammatory language being used by the bigots trying to limit Trans rights IMO.

        • @A_Random_Idiot
          link
          English
          98 months ago

          That word is being abused lately. Trans people aren’t being packed into trains and sent to gas chambers.

          Just cause we’re not there yet doesnt mean we’re not heading there

          • @Cryophilia
            link
            18 months ago

            So it’s not in action. It’s just attempted. Or being planned for.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -28 months ago

            You’re not wrong but we should still use the correct language so that when we actually get somewhere nasty, the language isn’t diminished beyond the point of usefulness.

            • @Gradually_Adjusting
              link
              English
              38 months ago

              What it means is “the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group”. The GOP is definitely trying to create a world without trans people by any means necessary, so unless your quibble is that trans isn’t an ethnic group, I don’t see how I’m misusing that word.

              • @Cryophilia
                link
                08 months ago

                Which is not happening yet, although they want it to be.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -18 months ago

                Are you claiming that not providing the medical care to transition is akin to deliberate killing?

                Cuz even the most Liberal courts are going to struggle with that one…

              • @TokenBoomer
                link
                -18 months ago

                They’re not an ethnic group, and unless everyone in the United States are trans, it doesn’t apply. Persecuted, discriminated, yes. Genocide, no.

                • @Gradually_Adjusting
                  link
                  English
                  28 months ago

                  And yet, if something so evidently man-made and contrived as nationality can constitute a grounds for the definition of genocide, then so too could we use any number of qualities more integral to the human condition to speak intelligently about genocide. It beggars the imagination to suppose we can gain anything by fretfully splitting hairs when we have a word to hand which quite precisely encapsulates the most ardent desires and aims of the perpetrators. People are being murdered, terrorized, made illegal, and hounded out of public life through political means by elected officials and the apparatus of state, whom themselves do not mince words. Historians are the ones who must take care with their words, and even they know when to say the word “quisling”.

                  • @TokenBoomer
                    link
                    28 months ago

                    It is being debated.

                    Some legal scholars and transgender rights activists have argued this definition should be expanded to include transgender persons. Others have critiqued the term “transgender genocide” as inappropriate for modern Western contexts, arguing that current levels of discrimination and violence fail to reach the legal definition of genocide.

    • @assassin_aragorn
      link
      48 months ago

      Absolutely, but that’s not something the president has powers over. We need Congress to pass a law that allows the federal government to crack down hard on states doing this. And we need a Congress to bitch slap the Supreme Court back into actually following the Constitution and not being a right wing mouthpiece.