@ickplant to [email protected] • 10 months agoJane Goodall ruleimagemessage-square39arrow-up1256arrow-down110
arrow-up1246arrow-down1imageJane Goodall rule@ickplant to [email protected] • 10 months agomessage-square39
minus-square@Reddfugee42link1•10 months agoYou shouldn’t have to also take statistics to know what a statistically significant sample set is when determining whether or not something has been sufficiently peer-reviewed, but maybe for you specifically, it would be useful 🤷♂️
minus-square@TotallynotJessicalink1•10 months agoI hope for humanity’s sake you don’t actually work in any scientific field. We need fewer embodiments of the Dunning–Kruger effect, not more.
minus-square@Reddfugee42link1•10 months agoPaging Dr. Irony, will Dr. Irony please come to the comment section? 🤣
You shouldn’t have to also take statistics to know what a statistically significant sample set is when determining whether or not something has been sufficiently peer-reviewed, but maybe for you specifically, it would be useful 🤷♂️
I hope for humanity’s sake you don’t actually work in any scientific field. We need fewer embodiments of the Dunning–Kruger effect, not more.
Paging Dr. Irony, will Dr. Irony please come to the comment section?
🤣