If this isn’t just corporate hype, this could be great for making smaller batteries, hopefully less resource intensive.

  • NaibofTabr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68 months ago

    Alternatively, they could make smaller versions for consumer vehicles that take up less space/weight.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      Yeah, this kind of headline is stupid. Any battery can offer any given range if it’s large enough. This kind of thing should be written as distance/mass or, for consumer products, cost/distance.

      • @nBodyProblem
        link
        6
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Even that is meaningless because the vehicle you put a battery in is as important or moreso than the battery.

        Aptera has a claimed 1,000+ mile range with a 100 kWh lithium battery. Meanwhile, the Rivian R1S has a claimed 270 mile range when equipped with a 106 kWh battery.

        The main difference is that the Aptera is a light and aerodynamic car built for maximum efficiency instead of a 6,000 lb pickup truck. Any battery can boast amazing numbers if you are flexible enough with the use case.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          That’s true. I guess it should just be kWh/mass. Either that or we should have a standard vehicle all batteries are tested on for headlines if they want to talk about distance, which is obviously more understandable to the average reader.