I just read this point in a comment and wanted to bring it to the spotlight.

Meta has practically unlimited resources. They will make access to the fediverse fast with their top tier servers.

As per my understanding this will make small instances less desirable to the common user. And the effects will be:

  1. Meta can and will unethically defedrate from instances which are a theat to them. Which the majority of the population won’t care about, again making the small instances obsolete.
  2. When majority of the content is on the Meta servers they can and will provide fast access to it and unethically slow down access to the content from outside instances. This will be noticeable but cannot be proved, and in the end the common users just won’t care. They will use Threads because its faster.

This is just what i could think of, there are many more ways to be evil. Meta has the best engineers in the world who will figure out more discrete and impactful ways to harm the small instances.

Privacy: I know they can scrape data from the fediverse right now. That’s not a problem. The problem comes when they launch their own Android / iOS app and collect data about my search and what kind of Camel milk I like.

My thoughts: I think building our own userbase is better than federating with an evil corp. with unlimited resources and talent which they will use to destroy the federation just to get a few users.

I hope this post reaches the instance admins. The Cons outweigh the Pros in this case.

We couldn’t get the people to use Signal. This is our chance to make a change.

  • @magnolia_mayhem
    link
    English
    281 year ago

    I see your panic and raise you a “what’s the solution?”

    • candyman337
      link
      English
      551 year ago

      Keep it separate, mass de-federate. The biggest lemmy instance has to make a stance.

      • @Melco
        link
        English
        271 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • @booty_flexx
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          Wonder if they were invited to metas p92 meeting for “off the record conversation” and obliged

        • Chocolate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          I have opposite take on this. For me, it would be nice to interact with normie friends while we use our favorite service

      • drdaeman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        needed to integrate privacy protection into its licence

        No. That would’ve been a much worse disaster. It is a good thing that APIs and protocols aren’t licensable/copyrightable.

          • drdaeman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not sure you understand me. What I wanted to say is that if APIs and protocols would be copyrightable, and SCO and Oracle would’ve won their respective lawsuits, the world would look so different (in regards to Free and Open Source Software) I’m not completely sure if Fediverse would be a thing.

    • Andy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      I think the solution is for each instance to decide whether to federate with Threads or not.

      The only way an attempt to coopt the Fediverse wouldn’t happen world be if the project failed. If this system is going to work, major players will want to participate, and they’ll want to accrue power and dominate over the system. Creating tools to establish boundaries and checks is fundamentally the point, so I think we should all strive to understand and contribute to the development and administration of institutions we like. And if we do that, and also compel our governments to impose regulations on big tech they WILL come up against limits to their power.

    • 🦥󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      I’ll raise your “what’s the solution” with a “lets avoid the problem entirely”.

      Prevention is better than cure.