• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    68 months ago

    I dunno but it’s cartoon better have a little tin cup and be begging - they are aggressive AF with trying to get donations. In general, but especially if you ever give them money.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They sorta have to be aggressive because it’s damn near impossible to get people to pay for online services nowadays. Everybody expects to get everything for free, but also nobody wants to see ads (for a good reason too, mind you.)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -38 months ago

        Yeah, I wish they would push a different model. I think the charity model is likely unsustainable long term. Quality contributions to the information should buy you some access and perhaps everyone gets access to some basic info on entries but more in depth data requires a micropayment perhaps.

        • @Duamerthrax
          link
          5
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It would get infested with bots writing articles and other bots upvoting the quality status. The people with resources to do that wouldn’t have any interest in telling the truth.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          Unfortunately that’d probably kill it ded; like I said, people are really loath to pay for online services.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          PAYWALL WIKIPEDIA?!

          How dare you sir!

          They take heat for fundraising like they’re on the edge although they have full coffers. Hopefully it’s sustainable!