ɐɥO to [email protected] • edit-211 months agoI hate that guylemmy.ohaa.xyzimagemessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up11.84Karrow-down1139file-text
arrow-up11.7Karrow-down1imageI hate that guylemmy.ohaa.xyzɐɥO to [email protected] • edit-211 months agomessage-square125fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink18•11 months agoThat seems to be mostly about monetization and commodification, which should already be absent from shitposting.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•11 months agoI get that but I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.
minus-squareInstigatelinkfedilink11•11 months ago I think he’d feel this similarly devalues it. I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance. Well… which is it? Do you respect him too much to assume his stance or are you assuming he’d feel this similarly devalues it?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•11 months agoI mean I don’t want to assume he’d be alright with it therefore I won’t use it. Nothing I said was definitive, just what I think.
minus-square@SpaceNoodlelink3•11 months agoWell somebody should pop over to Chagrin Falls and ask him
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•11 months agoI suppose that would also have worked, but no.
That seems to be mostly about monetization and commodification, which should already be absent from shitposting.
I get that but I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.
Well… which is it? Do you respect him too much to assume his stance or are you assuming he’d feel this similarly devalues it?
I mean I don’t want to assume he’d be alright with it therefore I won’t use it. Nothing I said was definitive, just what I think.
Well somebody should pop over to Chagrin Falls and ask him
Did you mean “this” stance, maybe?
I suppose that would also have worked, but no.