Don’t worry everyone, I’m sure someone somewhere is worse and that makes this okay somehow.

    • @Viking_Hippie
      link
      -20
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That’s not really the point, though.

      Edit to elaborate: Whether or not this specific one is real, it perfectly illustrates the hypocrisy of trans ally neoliberals who persecute and punish unhoused people for existing near them.

      • @Starbuck
        link
        347 months ago

        If there were so many examples of this in the real world, then you wouldn’t need to photoshop one.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -57 months ago

          The French Revolution was well documented and people still enjoy A Tale of Two Cities

          Are you saying we don’t need any fiction - novels, tv, movies, jokes, comics, memes… because there exists non-fiction versions?

          • @Starbuck
            link
            57 months ago

            I think you and the others trying to pass off the same idea don’t seem to understand the problem here. It’s not that you can’t have satire, or fiction that acts as a social commentary. It’s that all of the examples you are mentioning aren’t trying to pass themselves off as reality . Nobody reads A Tale of Two Cities and thinks that it is literal. Or A Modest Proposal. This here is trying to pass itself off as real and as soon as it gets called out for it, the choir shows up to say “Oh, so we can’t have satire anymore”.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -17 months ago

              I genuinely don’t think anyone thinks these are trans-inclusive homeless spikes.

              At best they got painted bright colors for visibility and they accidentally used the trans flag

              • KillingTimeItself
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                at arguably more best, someone decided to vandalize them as an act of political commentary.

                “It’s often said that the most potent form of rhetoric is the contradictory form” - i just made that up :)

        • @Viking_Hippie
          link
          -177 months ago

          Again, it’s an illustration of the hypocrisy. It doesn’t need to literally exist as a physical object in order to make the point.

          • @danc4498
            link
            English
            237 months ago

            It’s a fabrication of a hypocrisy. If the hypocrisy is real, you wouldn’t need to fabricate it.

              • @danc4498
                link
                English
                27 months ago

                Nice try. It is deception. Satire isn’t intended to be deceptive. This post was.

                • @TokenBoomer
                  link
                  -17 months ago

                  From the description on Wikipedia:

                  Satire is found in many artistic forms of expression, including internet memes, literature, plays, commentary, music, film and television shows, and media such as lyrics.

                  Satire often utilizes fiction.

                  • @danc4498
                    link
                    English
                    27 months ago

                    Nice try. It is deception. Satire isn’t intended to be deceptive. This post was.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -57 months ago

              I mean the hypocrisy really exists, but you’re right that this particularly egregious and shocking example is likely a total fabrication.

            • @Viking_Hippie
              link
              -67 months ago

              Sometimes fiction and altered objects depict abstract concept better than real physical objects do and neoliberals tend not to say the quiet parts loudly like the fascist party on the other side of the aisle has increasingly been doing in recent years.

              • @danc4498
                link
                English
                137 months ago

                Do you not recognize that this is deceitful? I understand how fiction can present allegories to demonstrate real world themes. But this isn’t that. This is meant to portray reality and real life hypocrisy but is not actually real.

                If the hypocrisy is true, why the deception?

                • @Viking_Hippie
                  link
                  -6
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  If the hypocrisy is true, why the deception

                  Because the hypocrites do an effective job at explaining away and obfuscating their hypocrisy. This makes it clear in an way that literal reality doesn’t.

                  The rich people weren’t literally eating the babies of poor people when Jonathan Swift wrote A Modest Proposal, but that doesn’t mean that his point about their callous disregard for those less fortunate was fraudulent.

                  This is basically visual satire.

                  • @danc4498
                    link
                    English
                    97 months ago

                    Satire is not deceitful. You’re not meant to read A Modest Proposal and think rich people are eating poor babies. You’re meant to recognize the allegory and what it says about our real world.

                    This post is not satire. It is meant to deceive you into believing it is a real photo.

      • @mojofrododojo
        link
        English
        87 months ago

        get fucked with that bullshit. trans allies aren’t out there persecuting anyone. jfc, where do you come up with this bullshit?

        • @Maggoty
          link
          -17 months ago

          Tell that to the homeless people forced to play frogger across the interstate near where I live. And the entire working class neighborhood whose flood risk was ignored by the city for decades until this year because it got mostly destroyed.

          Camping bans are persecution. Building shiny stuff instead of taking care of people is persecution. It’s not bold or in your face but it’s real.

          • @garbagebagel
            link
            8
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Bruh what the fuck did trans people/trans allies have to do with the circumstances that created these issues? Stop using them as a scapegoat.

            Anti homelessness is very real and very obvious but I’ve never seen a fucking pride parade advocating for the removal of safe spaces for the unhoused. I do regularly see politicians advocating for that shit though.

            • @Maggoty
              link
              17 months ago

              They pass laws protecting the rights of LGBTQ people (Which is awesome). And then they pass laws to criminalize homelessness while they profit off the current state of real estate. (Not awesome)

              • @garbagebagel
                link
                17 months ago

                In my experience, the politicians that are out there passing laws to criminalize homelessness are usually the ones that are more outspoken against the rights of LGBTQ people. In any case, trans people’s existence has nothing to do with anti homeless laws. Stop trying to conflate the two.

                • @TokenBoomer
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  They are both oppressed minority groups under capitalism. This is utilized under the class system to make oppressed minority groups within the system compete with each other for rights.

                  To go further, hypothetically, the Democrats may advocate for rights for dog lovers while making laws against the cat fans, while Republicans might advocate for the cat fans, while making laws against dog lovers. In that way, the government makes citizens vie for rights while diminishing class unity.

                • @Maggoty
                  link
                  0
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Well yeah, that’s the point. They’re two different issues and people who support trans people do not necessarily support other oppressed groups. I’ve been trying to point that out this entire time.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 months ago

            “damn, rich people exist. Ow, fuck, i just fell off a bridge and broke all of my bones” - you rn.

            • @Maggoty
              link
              17 months ago

              What are you saying?

              • KillingTimeItself
                link
                fedilink
                English
                37 months ago

                it’s a haha funny about the conflation being made in the original statement.

                I’m just smashing two things together, and saying that one caused the other, much like they did.

                • @Maggoty
                  link
                  17 months ago

                  Then you need to re read something in the chain.

                  • KillingTimeItself
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    17 months ago

                    no i understand the point they were making, they stated it in an utterly shit way. That left shit tons of room up for interpretation.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        the hypocrisy? The hypocrisy of who? The fucking politicians that fund this type of shit?

        WHO ARE WE MAKING FUN OF

        • @Viking_Hippie
          link
          47 months ago

          The hypocrisy of who? The fucking politicians that fund this type of shit?

          WHO ARE WE MAKING FUN OF

          The liberals, politician and civilian alike, who support LGBTQ+ people’s right to exist without harassment but also are in favor of persecuting and punishing homeless people for existing near them.

          Like for example New York Mayor and once a cop always a cop Eric Adams who is in favor of both marriage equality and (not much short of) hunting the homeless for sport.

            • @Viking_Hippie
              link
              27 months ago

              True, but it’s evidently FAR too hard for anyone with power to not have at least one truly awful one, based on the fact that almost none of them manage it…

              • KillingTimeItself
                link
                fedilink
                English
                27 months ago

                to be fair, i think statistically, given the amount of opinions that it is possible to hold, that you are pretty likely to hold at least one objectively shitty opinion.

                • @Viking_Hippie
                  link
                  17 months ago

                  True, but I’m talking specifically of consequential opinions that profoundly affect the lives of others, not small stuff like not liking black liquorice 😉

                  • KillingTimeItself
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    17 months ago

                    i suppose so, but even then, there are just a lot of opinions you can hold. Politics being a massive one. For example, in my opinion, i believe that having any sort of party affiliation is just objectively wrong.