Listening to a recent episode of the Solarpunk Presents podcast reminded me the importance of consistently calling out cryptocurrency as a wasteful scam. The podcast hosts fail to do that, and because bad actors will continue to try to push crypto, we must condemn it with equal persistence.

Solarpunks must be skeptical of anyone saying it’s important to buy something, like a Tesla, or buy in, with cryptocurrency. Capitalists want nothing more than to co-opt radical movements, neutralizing them, to sell products.

People shilling crypto will tell you it decentralizes power. So that’s a lie, but solarpunks who believe it may be fooled into investing in this Ponzi scheme that burns more energy than some countries. Crypto will centralize power in billionaires, increasing their wealth and decreasing their accountability. That’s why Space Karen Elon Musk pushes crypto. The freer the market, the faster it devolves to monopoly. Rather than decentralizing anything, crypto would steer us toward a Bladerunner dystopia with its all-powerful Tyrell corporation.

Promoting crypto on a solarpunk podcast would be unforgivable. That’s not quite what happens on S5E1 “Let’s Talk Tech.” The hosts seem to understand crypto has no part in a solarpunk future or its prefigurative present. But they don’t come out and say that, adopting a tone of impartiality. At best, I would call this disingenuous. And it reeks of the both-sides-ism that corporate media used to paralyze climate action discourse for decades.

Crypto is not “appropriate tech,” and discussing it without any clarity is inappropriate.

Update for episode 5.3: In a case of hyper hypocrisy, they caution against accepting superficial solutions—things that appear utopian but really reinforce inequality and accelerate the climate crisis—while doing exactly that by talking up cryptocurrency.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Those against crypto, how do you propose we get to a solarpunk world from here?

    Hold up, there’s a huge leap of logic in this question. Are you saying there is a path if only we embraced cryptocurrency? If not, then why even phrase the question that way?

    My answer, then, would be “Mu”.

    • @mojo_raisin
      link
      English
      -18 months ago

      Are you saying there is a path if only we embraced cryptocurrency?

      No, I’m saying if we actually plan on making progress, maybe use available tools and don’t let purist thought, groupthink, and propaganda take our tools from us.

        • @mojo_raisin
          link
          English
          -48 months ago

          Why would avoiding a technology help you avoid groupthink?

          You’re conflating communities full of idiots that crypto tends to attract for a technology. These are not the same.

          Solar panels are technology that attracts lots of idiots and scammers (scammy companies abound if you’re not familiar), should we avoid solar panels? No, because solar technology doesn’t have anything to do directly with scammers right?

            • @mojo_raisin
              link
              English
              08 months ago

              So if a culture grew up around solar panels that you don’t like, we should avoid them and suffer the negative environmental consequences of throwing out one of our best tools to fight climate change?

              Smart

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                58 months ago

                Since crypto isn’t our best tool for anything, the analogy falls apart.

                Keep in mind that the leftist answer to currency is quite possibly none at all.

                • @mojo_raisin
                  link
                  English
                  28 months ago

                  Since crypto isn’t our best tool for anything, the analogy falls apart.

                  So only the best tools are allowed to be used then? How is the best tool determined? By whom?

                  Keep in mind that the leftist answer to currency is quite possibly none at all.

                  Yes, I am one of those leftists who desires a world without money and believes it’s possible (it was for hundreds of thousands of years in fact).