I’ve started reading Jumper by NameDoesNotMatter. I would like to formally apologise about all the harsh things I’ve ever spoken about that film.

Fine, the cast is unlikeable and the action scenes are just fisticuffs in the air, but my god, in comparison to the teenage dreck that is the book, it’s a masterpiece. At least they tried to build a credible back story for the main character.

In the book, he literally thinks everyone is out to sexually assault him (and somehow they seem to), he solves his problems by throwing money at it, instead of any actual creativity, and the author desperately tries to portray him as a mature-for-his-age adult, despite the fact that his first reaction to anything is crying followed by petty revenge.

I’m just flicking through the pages, pausing at any plot bits, and then flicking on.

  • mommykink
    link
    English
    9
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Jaws comes to mind, but I wouldn’t call it a bad book, per your OP, its just that the film is a really good film. Books that are already bad don’t really get film adaptions.

    • deweydecibel
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Same could be said for Jurassic Park if you feel like starting some arguments.

      Books that are already bad don’t really get film adaptions.

      Books get adaptations when they’re popular, not when they’re good.

      • @Shialac
        link
        26 months ago

        I actually think the book is way better than the movie