It was not clear whether Trump was urging his supporters to use the app or buy shares in Trump Media
This could look like an ill camouflaged attempt to influence the stock price, but remember this is a former president, a person with vast experience, who would never even dream of doing anything untoward. /s
Technically he said he wouldn’t lose votes…. But yeah, his fat ass probably thinks he’d get away with blatant murder at this point too. He needs a fucking wake up p call.
Honestly, he says to support Truth. I think it’s clear he means to use the app.
Buying stock is not the same as supporting the company. Any other company that’s said “support [company]” you wouldn’t even consider they meant “buy [company] stock”.
I guess. I read the comment and didn’t think there was a question about what he was referring to. But the article added in that layer of doubt for the reader.
This could look like an ill camouflaged attempt to influence the stock price, but remember this is a former president, a person with vast experience, who would never even dream of doing anything untoward. /s
He could shoot a person at Time Square and get away with it. /s
5th avenue
Times Square Elmo ain’t gonna stand for that shit
I’m willing to bet this happened.
Technically he said he wouldn’t lose votes…. But yeah, his fat ass probably thinks he’d get away with blatant murder at this point too. He needs a fucking wake up p call.
Biden should agree to debate him just to punch him in the mouth, go back to his mic and say Trump says presidents have immunity and walk off stage.
That would both cross a line of decorum to allow violence and validate his claims of immunity.
Fucking hilarious.
If Cannon was the judge, he probably would get away with it.
Why is this sarcasm?
Because stupid people or those who don’t follow the news wouldn’t pick up on the reference.
Right, I’m saying with our current legal system Im not sure that isn’t true.
Honestly, he says to support Truth. I think it’s clear he means to use the app.
Buying stock is not the same as supporting the company. Any other company that’s said “support [company]” you wouldn’t even consider they meant “buy [company] stock”.
This is not any other company. It is a very specific one with a longstanding track record of fraud.
I guess. I read the comment and didn’t think there was a question about what he was referring to. But the article added in that layer of doubt for the reader.
I don’t think that layer of doubt came from the article. It came from all the previous (and current) fraud and crimes that he’s committed.