• @Burninator05
      link
      537 months ago

      Absolutely. Not voting is a vote for the candidate you don’t like.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
        link
        English
        67 months ago

        The neat part is that, for me, voting is also a vote for the candidate I don’t like.

        • @Burninator05
          link
          17 months ago

          So I guess it comes down to which one will do the least harm to what you feel is the right thing. Both have had a term as president so we have a pretty good idea on how exactly they’ll act in their second one.

        • Xhieron
          link
          English
          207 months ago

          If the Republic plunges into a dark age, for example because democracy ended, and you stayed home when your contribution could have prevented it, you’re still sharing in the blame. No amount of smug self-righteousness will wind back the clock. You already have one previous devastating administration and an insurrection worth of warning.

          Do you want to keep the Republic, or not?

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
            link
            English
            07 months ago

            Do you want to keep the Republic, or not?

            I don’t want the republic but I don’t want fascism either

            • @pandacoder
              link
              197 months ago

              The genocide argument is a really bad one. Yes the Biden administration is culpable. The Trump administration would pump more money into it and start parading around the genocide like it’s a good thing.

              There’s voting for the side who might get tired of the public opposition and stop funding that shit, or letting the genocidal wannabe dictator win.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  9
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Okay, so we punish the Democrats and the Republicans necessarily win as a result. Hopefully that’s not a controversial assumption.

                  How many such intentional losses should be planned on so that we can get the Democrats try to move left to recapture support? How are we going to ensure they try to better court the left instead of moving to the right?

                  • @AquaTofana
                    link
                    7
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    I’m always so confused by this argument because “punishing the Democrats by letting Republicans win”…wouldn’t the assumption just be that the people WANT a more right wing government?

                    Wouldn’t that simply encourage politicians to be like “Oh, the crazies won last time. Maybe that’s who our voting block is now. Maybe it’s time to also be crazy.”

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  87 months ago

                  Okay, so when the election happens, vote to keep the fascists out of power, and every other day the 4 years in between do something to push politics in the direction you want it to go.

                • @pandacoder
                  link
                  27 months ago

                  No I’m thinking in terms of we cannot revive the dead so let’s not put the genocidal wannabe dictator in power for 4 years. I clearly can’t stop what’s currently happening but I’m sure as hell not going to vote in a way that results in more people dying more quickly.

                  You mistake accepting genocide with trying to prevent a worse genocide.

        • @gmtom
          link
          107 months ago

          Enjoy having your bodily autonomy stripped away and turned into a baby making factory because you don’t understand the concept of harm reduction.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
            link
            English
            67 months ago

            The fact that this is even on the table is why I’m upset. A sane government would not let that sort of thing happen. But we have a majority of the Supreme Court nominated by two presidents who lost the popular vote because a bunch of slave owners over 200 years ago were butthurt at the idea that the popular vote for president wouldn’t go their way.

            • @disguy_ovahea
              link
              2
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              The Electoral College was also established to aid in guiding uninformed voters. It was logical to implement it for presidential elections, since most people wouldn’t have heard about the policy or platform of either candidate.

              We have the Internet now, so that point is moot.

              • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
                link
                English
                17 months ago

                Exactly. Our government is like we took an 18th century sailing ship, bolted on a steam engine, piled it full of people, and then strapped on some wings so it could fly to the moon.

                The structure of our government is so anachronistic I don’t know why people are upset it’s working so horribly.

                • @disguy_ovahea
                  link
                  2
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  The most important thing left out of the Constitution were the instructions on how often to update it.

                  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
                    link
                    English
                    27 months ago

                    There are instructions, but those instructions were also modified at the behest of slave owners who wanted an outsized influence. So we can’t update it without risking something even worse.

                    What should have been added was the requirement that it be updated every 20 years.