More than a dozen members of the storied political family will endorse the president in Philadelphia, rejecting one of their own as he worries Democrats with an independent bid.
You know, the thing they constantly say they’re going to do.
She doesn’t even consider it a possibility so me saying that I won’t help her if it happens is a non-thing.
And if you’re curious, her opinion on the repeal of abortion rights is also shitty. “I live in a state where I can get one so it’s not an issue.”
And when I mention that it’s a possibility that if Republicans gain power they’ll pass a national ban she again shoots it down as something that they wouldn’t do.
Sounds like she’s in denial. Does she also change the subject when losing an argument?
Anyways, I think you have better chances addressing her denialism than to argue any other political point. As long as someone won’t argue in good faith, all other arguements and debates become pointless diversions.
“They wouldn’t do that.”
You know, the thing they constantly say they’re going to do.
She doesn’t even consider it a possibility so me saying that I won’t help her if it happens is a non-thing.
And if you’re curious, her opinion on the repeal of abortion rights is also shitty. “I live in a state where I can get one so it’s not an issue.”
And when I mention that it’s a possibility that if Republicans gain power they’ll pass a national ban she again shoots it down as something that they wouldn’t do.
Sounds like she’s in denial. Does she also change the subject when losing an argument?
Anyways, I think you have better chances addressing her denialism than to argue any other political point. As long as someone won’t argue in good faith, all other arguements and debates become pointless diversions.