• prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Well if the two options I have are: continue being able to afford to live while doing a job that can now be done by a machine, or to just let it happen with zero safety net and let the good vibes from the naive optimism of “if enough people go hungry, then things will have to change.” I know what I’m choosing and I’m sure that will be a great comfort in that time

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Those are not your two options. Society will have to reform from technological pressure. Political activism, such as lobbying for a universal basic income, is part of this.

      Trying to fight progress just so you can keep your shitty job helps neither you nor society. That energy would be better spent on a future that’s better for everybody.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It seems as though maybe you haven’t studied capitalism or, I dunno, the history of human society?

        Those are the two options, because the things you are talking about takes generations to change, if they evevr do at all. Millions of people will starve to death and die in the streets before anything real ever has a chance of possibly changing.

        And no, I’m not personally worried about my job. At least not within my lifetime. But imagine caring about other people…