A sex offender convicted of making more than 1,000 indecent images of children has been banned from using any “AI creating tools” for the next five years in the first known case of its kind.

Anthony Dover, 48, was ordered by a UK court “not to use, visit or access” artificial intelligence generation tools without the prior permission of police as a condition of a sexual harm prevention order imposed in February.

The ban prohibits him from using tools such as text-to-image generators, which can make lifelike pictures based on a written command, and “nudifying” websites used to make explicit “deepfakes”.

Dover, who was given a community order and £200 fine, has also been explicitly ordered not to use Stable Diffusion software, which has reportedly been exploited by paedophiles to create hyper-realistic child sexual abuse material, according to records from a sentencing hearing at Poole magistrates court.

  • Flying SquidM
    link
    English
    589 months ago

    How could they possibly enforce this ban?

      • KubeRoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        Wasn’t the point that what he was using them for already illegal? Sounds like he already couldn’t get caught, so doesn’t seem like that’ll do much…

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        English
        199 months ago

        How will they even know he’s doing it? It doesn’t say they’re monitoring his internet connection. And even if they were monitoring his internet connection, he could go to some public wifi hotspot and sit in a car and do it.

          • @Mango
            link
            English
            49 months ago

            Is it weird that the whole detect/evade game just sounds super fun to me?

              • @Mango
                link
                English
                19 months ago

                Nahh, I’m not so much about the chase as the metagame.

                • @magnusrufus
                  link
                  English
                  59 months ago

                  Might want to checkout cyber security and pen testing. It’s not the same thing exactly but it kinda close in some regards.

                  • @Mango
                    link
                    English
                    19 months ago

                    That’s probably as close as I can get without picking out a taboo and running with it. I wonder if some drug lords get bored with the game and pretend to be pedophiles to catch bigger fish.

                  • @Mango
                    link
                    English
                    39 months ago

                    It’s like hunting down a secret base in Minecraft. When you find it, they use a better trick next time! The objective for security endeavors is always distinct but the methods are always changing as everyone gets better!

        • @magnusrufus
          link
          English
          49 months ago

          Put monitoring software on his devices.

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            English
            109 months ago

            He could just get a burner phone. Realistically, there is no way to police this.

            • Scratch
              link
              fedilink
              English
              99 months ago

              This is pretty similar to restraining orders, make it more difficult and make the consequences more severe.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              59 months ago

              In the modern world when we have cellphones that can do pretty much anything… it’s fucking hard. There will be a parole officer and monitoring software with periodic physical inspections along with watching his purchases. (That’s, at least, th American approach).

              Usually the way it works is that when this dude slips up once he goes to prison for violating his court order.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              59 months ago

              Or a burner laptop/Chromebook/whatever. Couple that with a VPN, using a neighbor’s wifi, public hotspots, etc, I don’t really see how they can realistically enforce someone motivated to do what they’re gonna do.

            • @magnusrufus
              link
              English
              39 months ago

              Have part of his probation be having his property searched to check for such devices.

        • @stoly
          link
          English
          -29 months ago

          There’s a log for everything. There really is. It’s just hard to piece it all together.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      69 months ago

      Maybe they think he is capable of self enforcing the ruling?

      Or that they want the option of gaoling him if they so much as get a hint he’s using one of the services in any capacity.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      09 months ago

      Difficult indeed. Maybe banning him from owning a computer or graphics card capable of running local models. Installing spyware on his devices. I’m sure he could get around it, undetected, for a while, if he was determined. But he would be gambling at getting caught.

      To be honest I don’t really see the point. We are getting to a point where anyone can generate any image of anything at any time. Let him have his fun. We can’t sexual conversion therapy him and he isn’t hurting anyone. Ones and zeroes, bits and bytes.

      For anyone who thinks conversion therapy works; imagine someone trying to convert you from your sexuality. Let’s say I tried to make you gay. Would that ever work for you?