• Iron Lynx
    link
    667 months ago

    To be Devil’s Advocate:
    Given that the rest written in Comic Sans, it may be an early elementary school exercise, aimed at teaching kids to do multiplications. In this case, it’s tolerable and/or defensible to find a simplification for pi.

    That said, making pi equal to 3 would have been more accurate for that…

    • @Duamerthrax
      link
      127 months ago

      Unless the kid is even slightly above average and finds the idea that pi equaling 5 confusing.

      • @NucleusAdumbens
        link
        87 months ago

        …if they’re above average, I think they’ll figure out the explicitly defined variable. I think the instructor is trying to make sure this problem doesn’t require a calculator and figured defining pi as 5 makes it clear that you can treat it as a whole number. 3 would be more accurate and just as easy, but meh idk that this is that great of a blunder.

        • @Duamerthrax
          link
          -17 months ago

          You can be a smart kid and not realize that adults are lying.

          I remember the Peas and the Punnett Square. Sure, mendelian genetics explains pea plant colors, but doesn’t explain dog fur colors. Just providing a footnote that more completed genetics exists would have been nice.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      97 months ago

      Or it’s from an ME. They seldom can remember the rounded value of Pi, but they’re pretty sure it’s somewhere between 3 and 4. But you probably should use 5 just to be safe…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -337 months ago

      That’s a dumb way of teaching and you are a dumb devils advocate for saying it. Go to H E double hockey sticks.

      • @Papergeist
        link
        217 months ago

        Even in engineering it is common to just round pi to 3 and quickly estimate whatever it is your doing.

        • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
          link
          8
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          In astronomy, pi=1 or 10, depending on whether you’re trying to over or under estimate something. Because when you’re trying to estimate distances measured in millions of light years, the difference between 3 and 10 is just one or two orders of magnitude on a small number. It’s pretty common for astronomers to do napkin math by rounding every single number to the nearest zero. 91k becomes 100k for instance. Because the napkin math estimations are just trying to gauge whether some celestial event or object is a thousand light years away, ten thousand, a hundred thousand, etc… And pi becomes 10, because that’s the nearest round number.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            67 months ago

            Fermi Estimation. Where you’re dealing with something so big, you’re just interested in the magnitude.

        • @maniclucky
          link
          17 months ago

          Excuse me what? I’ve been an engineer for a decade and have never met anyone that would do that. We have calculators.

          • @assassin_aragorn
            link
            157 months ago

            I think they mean napkin math. Like you’re in a meeting and they ask for a general idea if something will work or not

            • @maniclucky
              link
              17 months ago

              I suppose. I’m still internally outraged and haven’t run into such a situation before, but I accept this.

              • @assassin_aragorn
                link
                27 months ago

                To be fair most of the situations where I’ve run into this have never involved pi, and sometimes it’s just qualitative.

                • @maniclucky
                  link
                  37 months ago

                  That makes sense. I feel like if you’re at the point where pi is meaningfully involved, you should probably do your math.

                  • @assassin_aragorn
                    link
                    27 months ago

                    Yeah I agree. It isn’t that hard to set up things in Excel to get a decent answer.

              • @assassin_aragorn
                link
                27 months ago

                Depends on the level of precision you need. If I want the volume in a 500 foot long, 3 inch pipe to roughly estimate how much supply I need to order, I wouldn’t need a calculator. It would very roughly be 90-95 ft3. (Divide 500 by 4 two times and multiple by 3)

                Then I would spend 5 minutes double checking myself haha.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -17 months ago

          I feel like a proper engineer would call only going two places past the decimal “rounding pie”.

      • GladiusB
        link
        37 months ago

        I need a new maitre’d for a restaurant I am opening. How busy are you?

          • GladiusB
            link
            47 months ago

            How does 1 million a minute sound?

              • GladiusB
                link
                27 months ago

                So you do know how to act like a decent human. Damn. Well the restaurant closed. I guess you can just be nice for your own esteem now.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 months ago

                  Nope. I had sold my house to move and told the kids already. Now I’m jaded I just lost out on 30 mill and we’re homeless. I’ll be an ass forever, now.

                  • GladiusB
                    link
                    27 months ago

                    Well you were before. So the fam should be used to it.