• JackGreenEarth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    449 months ago

    Why would you be using Windows for displaying literally what looks like a static image, maybe a video? Seems like massive overkill.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      429 months ago

      True, but if you’re a small independent business it’s pretty reasonable to believe they don’t have any techies. Just grabbing a basic Windows PC that you already understand is probably a simple enough solution.

      • @I_Miss_Daniel
        link
        English
        49 months ago

        Multi monitor support might also be easier in Windows depending on the hardware used?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          149 months ago

          Hard disagree. Most Linux releases have handled a second monitor automatically for years. Plug and play.

          • @I_Miss_Daniel
            link
            English
            89 months ago

            I’m talking like six monitors like I see at the local servo. Guessing they’re using some kind of displaylink usb adapters? Does Linux play OK with them?

          • @Aganim
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            For static setups like PC’s it is fine. For laptops however my experience is that every distro I tried fails horribly in providing a decent UX. Each and every time I plug in my monitor while my laptop is in sleep mode (so each time I worked at the office) I need to set up the proper resolution again when it wakes. I don’t know if Linux cannot handle 5120x1440 properly, but both X11 and Wayland just reset to glorious 640x480.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      179 months ago

      They’re using windows to show a webpage.

      Teensy tiny windows pcs are cheap and a low barrier of entry for “the tech guy”