• disguy_ovahea
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It’s three years old, because it’s a list of regulations that Trump repealed. He hasn’t been president since, so there’s no reason to update. Trump repealed Obama-era regulations that inhibited big oil in favor of zero-emission alternatives. That has a positive impact on oil production in the years that follow, hence the record production.

    • Ensign_Crab
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      And Biden did nothing at all to revert Trump’s changes?

      • disguy_ovahea
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        He has been, but it’s much easier and faster to repeal legislation than it is to enact it. Trump took us back a decade in his first two years in office.

        • Ensign_Crab
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          He has been, but it’s much easier and faster to repeal legislation than it is to enact it.

          Cool. Let’s repeal oil subsidies.

            • Ensign_Crab
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              He was trying to give Trump credit for Biden’s accomplishment.

          • disguy_ovahea
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            That’s part of the Inflation Reduction Act. In the Treasury Department’s Green Book, under the heading “eliminate fossil fuel tax preferences,” 13 current-law provisions will be repealed or replaced, raising $31 billion over 10 years. Additionally, the document details $66 billion of tax increases on the foreign income of U.S. oil and gas companies, costing the industry $97 billion.

              • disguy_ovahea
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I agree that Willow was a disappointment at first. They had existing leases, so they would’ve gotten the license with a subsequent lawsuit regardless. As part of the license agreement, the lease was reduced by a third, and they were required to forgo 68,000 acres of existing leases, which Biden recently included in the new 13 million acre reserve. Overall it was a big step back, and a bigger step forward.

                https://www.npr.org/2024/04/20/1246085825/biden-restricts-alaska-oil-gas-leasing-reserve

                • Ensign_Crab
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Overall it was a big step back, and a bigger step forward.

                  It was a big step back. I disagree that the step forward mitigates it with anywhere near the significance you’re ascribing to it.

                  • disguy_ovahea
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    In regards to climate change, the amount of oil extracted is not as impactful as the amount of land reclaimed. Each drilling site leased creates more CO2, and endangers more wildlife.

                    We can agree to disagree.