Bout damn time

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’d argue the opposite in a lot of cases, but not all.

      I’m more excited about the medical portion of re-classifying.

      edit I thought you meant the effects not the effects, so I agree with you.

      • @ripcord
        link
        408 months ago

        I thought you meant the effects not the effects

        Not sure that edit is clearing anything up.

      • gregorum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        78 months ago

        I think they meant wrt the federal government.

    • @ilinamorato
      link
      78 months ago

      But less bad than Fentanyl and other C-IIs, it sounds like.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -22
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This would have been a baby step 10 years ago if we’re being generous. California’s medical marijuana program has been a legal gray area since 1996. So what we can expect federal legalization in another 20 years at this rate? If biden touts this on the campaign trail as an accomplishment I’m going to lose my god damn mind.

      This is so long overdue it doesn’t deserve celebration, it deserves a “what took so long, this isnt even controversial”. If your partner/roommate has been telling you to do the dishes for 20 years and you finally wash some you don’t get to turn around and go “look at me, I did 20% of the dishes! aren’t I great!”

      • @JimmyeatsausageOP
        link
        348 months ago

        I mean, that’s a pretty slippery slope of logic you’re on. We should have addressed anthropogenic climate change in the 70s, but I’m not gonna poo-poo the progress we’ve made.

        I know it sucks that so many things change on a generational scale instead of a year scale, but I was also pretty damn happy about all that institutional inertia slowing down the hard-right turn we took during Trump’s 1st term.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -12
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Being happy with too little too late is exactly why climate change is going be as catastrophic as it will be so I really don’t get how that makes your case. If biden wanted to he could have pressured the dea to deschedule cannabis completely. He didn’t. The DNC hates to lose one of the carrots from their stick.

            • @JimmyeatsausageOP
              link
              78 months ago

              If it’s not already done, it’s too late to try or care.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                08 months ago

                …it’s a time machine. By its very nature, it’s never too late to try or care, just as long as you’ve built the damn thing.

                Unless you were going for more of a monkey’s paw/butterfly effect sorta vibe, which, for all we know of how the actual impact and ramifications of time travel actually work (I.e. effectively nothing in terms of concrete data), could be how the universe squares the circle on causality-violating disruption via some heretofore unknown mechanic vibe… in which case, yeah, totally possible.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -68 months ago

              “I’m going to thank you for doing 1% of what you could and should have instead of demanding to know why you didn’t do more”

      • @kinsnik
        link
        338 months ago

        Well, if you want faster change, you should probably stop blaming the lack of progress on the people who are trying to make changes and start blaming the people who block the changes

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -11
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          That’s the problem, they’re not or barely trying. Descheduling cannabis was within reach of this administration, they chose not to.

          • @kinsnik
            link
            128 months ago

            It wasn’t within reach; republicans control the house; before midterms, the decisive vote in the senate was Manchin. Democrats introduce bills to legalize weed, but unless they get a big majority those are not passing, and a law from Congress is needed for legalization.

            This is the best you can expect until more progressives are voted in.

            • Schadrach
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              It wasn’t within reach; republicans control the house; before midterms, the decisive vote in the senate was Manchin. Democrats introduce bills to legalize weed, but unless they get a big majority those are not passing, and a law from Congress is needed for legalization.

              This is the best you can expect until more progressives are voted in.

              Changing drug schedules, including removing a drug entirely from the schedules is a process that can be started by the DEA, HHS, public petition or Congress. Congress can just do it, while any of the others it involves DEA and HHS coordinating via the FDA and the DEA making the final call. IOW, literally the same process used to put pot on schedule III could have been used to deschedule pot entirely but they decided on schedule III instead.

              This wasn’t the act of the legislative branch, this was the act of agencies under the executive branch. Specifically the DEA and FDA which fall under DOJ and DHHS, respectively. Who in turn are headed by the Attorney General and Secretary of HHS, who are appointed by (and ultimately report to) the President.

              When people claim that Biden could legalize pot, they aren’t talking about something he has to negotiate with Congress and never have been - they’ve been talking about him ordering his direct appointees to push through the required bureaucratic process to do it themselves. And he eventually did, but only as a half measure.

      • @elliot_crane
        link
        208 months ago

        Our federal government always moves slowly and almost always is decades behind popular opinion, that’s not news. What is news is that someone did something, and that person is Joe Biden. Even if it’s long overdue, and even if it could be better, he acted on the opportunity to make it happen and that deserves credit.

      • RubberDuck
        cake
        link
        7
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That not how any of this works. Politics requires these kind of changes to move gradually. The states went first and showed that it can work, albeit with severe hampering from the federal government.

        Now there seems to be a public support for the next step and this is to gear up to allow dispensaries to become federally legal, have bank accounts and such. The government can then also regulate it in therma of quality and safety.

        We all see the damaging nature of alcohol so that comparison is always a bit strange imho.

        So we agree this is overdue, we disagree how much of a milestone this step is.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          Porn is legal and it is hard to find a payment processor that won’t gouge you.

          Puritan bullshit finds a way.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        68 months ago

        The biggest thing this does imo is unlock the ability for federal research dollars to study marijuana. There’s some other good thing sure that’ll pay dividends later on as steps towards more harm reduction, but getting off Schedule I IS a big step, if not a complete step to righting the wrongs of the war on (some) drugs.

      • @antidote101
        link
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Agreed, Trump almost managed a coup, loaded the Supreme Court, and would fire random officials every other week… Then the democrats pretend the position of the president is powerless.

        The establishment left are a joke.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          98 months ago

          Yeah, I’m really angry that the president didn’t “violate the law” to push through marijuana changes faster.

          What were you hoping to see them do that they didn’t?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            What, you mean experience and institutional knowledge are more important than undying loyalty and complacency with unilateral action?

          • @antidote101
            link
            18 months ago

            The heritage Foundation’s 2025 plan doesn’t just go away if Trump loses the election. The Republican party just sit on it, and sit on it, and sit on it, until they are elected again… And they will be elected again.

            So the establishment left needs to show some level of radical action to even “return” to centrist popularity.

            The President pulling rank on The DEA isn’t illegal, and would ensure a full term where the electoral process could be reviewed and further secured, and an a number of Supreme Court justices could be impeached under a stronger set of anti-corruption laws instituted by a democratic effort.

            Because sometimes corrective radicalism is called for and warranted… Like when someone almost does a coup.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              68 months ago

              The “pulling rank” the president is allowed to do, legally, is to order them to do a review of the scheduling. Which is what was done. Which finished, and now it’s being rescheduled.

              The president doesn’t actually have the authority to order the DEA to change the scheduling.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            08 months ago

            Why are you acting like “appointing a DEA administrator that is pro-legalization” and “make public statements encouraging them to deschedule cannabis” are somehow unthinkable and totalitarian?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              28 months ago

              … Because that’s what they did? The question was what would you like them to do that they didn’t do.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Please give me 1 example of Biden encouraging his DEA to deschedule cannabis because I can’t find one and doubt it exists.

                *downvoting me won’t make that statement exist. 2022 Biden statement on marijuana reform Notable absence: “marijuana should not be on the CSA list of scheduled drugs”. Interesting inclusion: ‘LSD is a good example of what should be a schedule 1 drug’

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  58 months ago

                  It doesn’t make you sound more credible when you skip over the part of the order where he directs HHS to review classification, which is all the president can legally order, to instead focus on the other part that isn’t actually a federal order.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -1
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Ok so where’s the example of him calling for descheduling marijuana which you said he did. Or the example that his DEA admin was pro-legalization.

      • @Pandawhiskers
        link
        -18 months ago

        That roommate analogy hit me right in the feels. Was just thinking yesterday if my roommate even decided to do the trash or any cleaning once soon, i wouldn’t even be happy bc it hasn’t been done in 3+ years and there’s much to make up for. But positive reinforcement and all right? It took long, but we should probably celebrate if it does happen to keep encouraging the process and stoke that flame. Firmly stating “good job so far, but the job’s not done yet.”