@[email protected] to No Stupid Questions • 5 months agoWhat is the Anti Commercial-Al license and why do people keep adding it to their comments?message-square141fedilinkarrow-up1154arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1150arrow-down1message-squareWhat is the Anti Commercial-Al license and why do people keep adding it to their comments?@[email protected] to No Stupid Questions • 5 months agomessage-square141fedilinkfile-text
I know what the Creative Commons is but not this new thing or why it keeps popping up in comments on Lemmy
minus-squareCosmic ClericlinkEnglish-17•edit-25 months ago Because you are effectively spreading misinformation. Are you a lawyer? People already struggle to understand copyright. Adding more confusion is doing everyone reading your license a disservice. Including a link to a Creative Commons license in a comment footer will not do that. Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
minus-squaremy_hat_stinkslinkfedilink9•5 months agoAdding a CC link and falsely claiming it’s an anti-AI licence is misinformation and undoubtedly does add confusion.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•5 months ago Are you a lawyer? I am not. Are you? Including a link to a Creative Commons license in a comment footer will not do that. It is when you give it a different name which doesn’t reflect the actual behaviour of the license.
minus-squareCosmic ClericlinkEnglish-8•5 months ago It is when you give it a different name That’s not a different name. It’s a sentence that’s a layman’s description of my intention for including it. Initially I was just using the actual Creative Commons license name, but it was confusing people just seeing letters and numbers. which doesn’t reflect the actual behaviour of the license. [Citation required.] Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
minus-square@AtariDumplink1•4 months agoNice how you never answered if you’re a lawyer. “I DO NOT GRANT PERMISSION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT TO READ THIS COMMENT. ANY USE OF THIS COMMENT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR ANY REASON IS ILLEGAL. THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE USED AS EVIDENCE AGAINST ANY NON-LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONS IN RELATION TO ANY CRIME.”
Are you a lawyer?
Including a link to a Creative Commons license in a comment footer will not do that.
Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Adding a CC link and falsely claiming it’s an anti-AI licence is misinformation and undoubtedly does add confusion.
I am not. Are you?
It is when you give it a different name which doesn’t reflect the actual behaviour of the license.
That’s not a different name. It’s a sentence that’s a layman’s description of my intention for including it.
Initially I was just using the actual Creative Commons license name, but it was confusing people just seeing letters and numbers.
[Citation required.]
Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Nice how you never answered if you’re a lawyer.
“I DO NOT GRANT PERMISSION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT TO READ THIS COMMENT. ANY USE OF THIS COMMENT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR ANY REASON IS ILLEGAL. THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE USED AS EVIDENCE AGAINST ANY NON-LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONS IN RELATION TO ANY CRIME.”