• FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    2
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    ‘Cuz nobody back then ever cheated…

    Further the reality of parentage doesn’t change with a divorce. This is arbitrary bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      128 days ago

      People cheated for sure, but if you were married you were simply on the hook for the offspring even if it wasn’t yours.

      I’m not saying the law is good, I’m saying it made sense for the time it was passed in. Now that we have genetic testing to confirm paternity or should be repealed.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        028 days ago

        Or they could have just created the law that said “the child was conceived under wedlock, the husband is on the hook.”

        But details. There’s no reason to use birth, as the critical time. Because if they knew she was pregnant to hold the divorce…. Then they could just make the guy cough up support. (Including while pregnant.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          127 days ago

          Or they could have just created the law that said “the child was conceived under wedlock, the husband is on the hook.”

          To make someone the father they have to inform them of it. There’s nothing stopping the father from flying the coop once divorced. While the proceedings are in progress, the judge has the right to keep the father to be present. And this was more of a concern when you could disappear and start a new life by moving across town.