• @3volver
    link
    2914 days ago

    We need to stop eating beef. The fact that no one thinks that if they stop eating beef they won’t have any effect is disturbing as fuck. If everyone stops eating beef then the industry will collapse.

    The fact that I don’t see this graph more often is annoying, I hate having to keep bringing this up, someone else share this for fucks sake please.

    • Hanrahan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 days ago

      We coukd start by not replacing meat eating pet’s when they pass,this fetisihization of pets is bizzare. The US uses more meat for pet dogs then all of the meat conumed in Germany as one example.

      That aside, we could start with banning advertising, private jets, cruise ships, jet skis, flying, motocross bikes, private cars etc why ? Some poor dude being told to stop eating a burger isn’t going to take anyone seriously if Gate’s etal are still flying around in a private jet and folks are jetting around the world to see a Taylor Swift concert.

      https://skepticalscience.com/animal-agriculture-meat-global-warming.htm

      The burning of fossil fuels for electricity and heat accounts for the majority of greenhouse gas emissions, totaling 31% of annual global greenhouse gas emissions, followed by transportation at 15%, manufacturing at 12.4% and animal agriculture at 11%

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1514 days ago

      Seriously. Animal agriculture needs to end and not exist whether we live in a capitalist dystopia or communist utopia, for the environment and for the sake of all sentient beings

      • @3volver
        link
        1014 days ago

        The fact that you and I got downvotes just speaks massive volumes. We might not make it as a species because we have so many individuals who think it doesn’t matter either way. WE ALL PLAY A FUCKING ROLE, TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR DECISIONS IN YOUR LIFE TIME.

    • AgentOrangesicle
      link
      514 days ago

      Also concerning how many tons of beef products I’ve tossed due to mold in food production. Large-scale manufacturing has so many holes we could fill if only it was profitable for the companies to do so.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        214 days ago

        Usually my neighbor slaughters one or two oxen per year. In summer they’re on land that I own, in winter they’re fed grass he’s mowing on some other meadows of his own. When all is said and done, he gets about 30€ per kg for the meat to cover the costs.

        This reduces meat to a mixture luxury for the weekend and this is with basically with the least amount of costs possible. The only things that are paid in this chain of production is the tractor for mowing grass, the vet, the butcher and insurance and taxes for the land and the stable in winter. I can’t (well, I can) imagine how the meat industry manages to hit a third of the price or less.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          113 days ago

          I agree meat is a luxury. If we look historically, farm meat was common at the table of the wealthy, but sparring at the table of the common man. It’s often made me wonder about the sustainabity of hunted meats if we were to treat meat as a luxury item reserved for celebrations. It seems like there’s quite the potential for carbon offset according to this article: Wild meat consumption in tropical forests spares a significant carbon footprint from the livestock production sector. The article also seems to suggest in this context a necesity of more and larger reforesting/rewilding efforts. I skimmed through this, so if there’s contradiction I missed please comment.

    • @RealFknNito
      link
      English
      114 days ago

      I only eat Chicken and meat substitutes like Beyond meat. The problem is that greenhouses also produce a worrying amount of carbon and ramping that up could have similar effects.

      • @3volver
        link
        214 days ago

        I think you misunderstood this graph. This is per kilogram of food product. It has nothing to do with scale, it’s a ratio.

        • @RealFknNito
          link
          English
          214 days ago

          I think you misunderstood my comment. I’m saying that as we transition away from meat products into meat substitutes, actual greenhouses will start producing more carbon emissions and simply replace the beef industry rather than amend it entirely. The systems used to regulate greenhouses are unfortunately contributing to the problem they were meant to solve.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        113 days ago

        This comment confuses me. How do you reckon that growing plants produces more carbon than growing plants and feeding them to animals?

        • @RealFknNito
          link
          English
          113 days ago

          Growing them outside is a lot different than doing so in a temperature controlled and highly regulated environment. Air cooling, sun lamps, all that uses power and that demand goes to the grid, which is coal and oil fueled.

            • @RealFknNito
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Sure, but how do you grow enough to last the winter without greenhouses? Do you only eat meat alternatives in the growing seasons? The problem with everyone being vegan is that we don’t have an agricultural infrastructure to fully support plant based food to last the entire year without greenhouses. Winter, disease, sunlight, water, all these things have a carbon cost to obtain, use, or fight against.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                How do you feed the animals in winter?

                Livestock requires food too. However much you need to grow and store in the warm months to feed the animals in winter could feed 10 times as many humans instead, regardless of how you do that. Not feeding the plants we grow to animals would necessarily be more efficient.

                • @RealFknNito
                  link
                  English
                  112 days ago

                  I’m not saying greenhouses are worse I’m saying they aren’t so much better than changing to plants only would be a significant enough change at scale. We need to address the core of power production, coal and oil.