@canihasaccount to Science [email protected]English • 5 months agoPeer review can be funimagemessage-square19arrow-up1379arrow-down16
arrow-up1373arrow-down1imagePeer review can be fun@canihasaccount to Science [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square19
minus-square@DaddleDewlinkEnglish101•edit-25 months agoCould it be some sort of meta joke where the reviewer is mocking how the paper is written by imitating its bad writing style?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish57•5 months agoI bet it’s a form with multiple entries, each entry is not different enough of the other ones: How is the subject of this paper ? What about the style ? You checked to reject it, why should it be rejected ? What’s the overall comment ? Then it’s all concatenated into one blob of review.
Could it be some sort of meta joke where the reviewer is mocking how the paper is written by imitating its bad writing style?
I bet it’s a form with multiple entries, each entry is not different enough of the other ones:
How is the subject of this paper ?
What about the style ?
You checked to reject it, why should it be rejected ?
What’s the overall comment ?
Then it’s all concatenated into one blob of review.