• @jerdle_lemmy
    link
    English
    0
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s a lot of room on the left between communism and neoliberalism. Have you heard of non-communist socialism (e.g. Titoist market socialism)?

    • Move to lemm.ee
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Claiming Tito was not a communist is getting kinda weird given the party was called the League of Communists of Yugoslavia

      • @jerdle_lemmy
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        I’m personally closer to social democracy, but relatively on the left of that area, towards market socialism.

        • Move to lemm.ee
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          Why Tito’s market socialism and not SWCC then?

          • @jerdle_lemmy
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            Because I prefer my ideology with less authoritarianism. SWCC is borderline fascist.

            • Move to lemm.ee
              link
              English
              51 year ago

              SWCC is borderline fascist.

              Why do you say that? The electoral structure is almost identical to Cuba, although significantly larger in scale (due to obvious population differences), both systems were derivative of the USSR’s system.

              What unique structural feature makes you call one fascist over the other? I at least assume you don’t consider Cuba fascist. And what exactly is your take on the USSR? You are aware that the electoral system of Yugoslavia under Tito was also extremely similar right? I mention this since you implied you were fond of titoism.