“The guy is not a democrat with a small d,” the president told CNN’s Erin Burnett.
President Joe Biden said in an interview Wednesday he is all but certain Donald Trump, his predecessor and presumptive 2024 rival, will reject the results of the November election and called Trump “dangerous” for the nation.
“The guy is not a democrat with a small d,” Biden told CNN’s Erin Burnett during a visit to Wisconsin this week.
“How many court cases do they have, Supreme Court cases? They’ve all said this is a totally legitimate election. … He may not accept the outcome of the election? I promise you he won’t. Which is dangerous.”
The president went on to say other world leaders had expressed to him their fear of a second Trump presidency and pointed to Trump’s pledge to prosecute his political opponents if he enters the Oval Office once more.
Take a look at his/her post history, champ.
I’m not sure what their post history has to do with this one comment in which they criticize all older politicians.
Removed by mod
ad hominems dont make you look smarter, and “champ” is so overused meme-cringe at this point that i cannot fathom how you have the courage to use it.
I could say the same about your sock-puppety comments, i could go grab some pastas from /c/politics and sub them in for your entire post history
I could write a insufferable lib LLM and people wouldn’t know the difference.
I could tell you more, but you’ve already stopped reading, and started filling out your “Mad Libs” reply, right?
Oh, look, another white knight riding in for the guy who’s pushing an agenda. Why are you so mad? Ad hominems are appropriate when dealing with bad faith actors because they aren’t here for discourse. And I can give a rats ass what ya think, champ. But go ahead and side with the chucklefucks.
That doesn’t seem like a productive way to carry on a conversation. I said I didn’t get your point. Perhaps you could try to explain it to me in another way instead of devolving into insults and unfounded accusations.
By refusing to consider a user’s post history and therefore blinding yourself to their obvious motivations, you are making a conscious choice to be ignorant.
I didn’t refuse anything. I said I wasn’t sure what their post history has to do with this one comment, and then immediately got accused of being an alt account.
lmao I’m always glad when I stumble upon a comment section like this where someone makes it abundantly clear that blocking them will be of no consequence whatsoever because they have absolutely no intention of approaching any discussion in good faith. It saves us all a little hassle, so thanks!
I got insulted almost immediately and I’m the one who isn’t approaching the conversation in good faith?
Correct. You are intenionally being ignorant by refusing to see the whole concept. I am quite positive you are the kind of person to say “But I am just asking a question!” when you are being called out to your bs.
Ain’t falling for the bait, champ. It’s clear as day what my point is, and if you can’t see it, then idk what to tell ya. Why is it everyone else gets my point and you’re the only chucklefuck that doesn’t?
There’s no “bait” (not even sure what I’d be baiting). What is clear to one person may not be clear to another.
Not my problem.