minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink27•7 months agoit’s pro hoc, not cum hoc. which is to not say that it is not objectively, very funny.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink37•6 months agoha ha your mom hock my cum every night thru my jorts lol gottem
minus-squarelapeslinkfedilink8•7 months agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation#
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•7 months agoI though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•6 months agoI think you might mean “post hoc…” which is a more specific case of “cum hoc…” and sets focus on time/order of events
it’s pro hoc, not cum hoc. which is to not say that it is not objectively, very funny.
ha ha your mom hock my cum every night thru my jorts lol gottem
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation#
deleted by creator
I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I think you might mean “post hoc…” which is a more specific case of “cum hoc…” and sets focus on time/order of events