• @TotallynotJessica
      link
      234 months ago

      They used to be, but the current Republican party explicitly rejects liberalism. They don’t follow any liberal ideas, even on capitalism and free markets. They’re willing to bend any principle for power. They’re fascists.

        • @butwhyishischinabook
          link
          174 months ago

          “Relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise.” How the fuck does that describe the GOP?? I mean yeah I get the argument relative to economics, but on the civil rights side of things no.

                • @butwhyishischinabook
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Oh I completely agree with you, I’m a more libertarian kind of socialist myself so I definitely don’t think liberalism is the answer. I also think that’s is disingenuous, and really discrediting to leftists as a whole, when people try to say that the GOP is liberal. They’re definitely not; on almost any social issue they are firmly opposed to the liberal position on civil rights, freedom of association, etc etc.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    34 months ago

                    Yeah, they did turn into fascists in the last few decades… As liberals tend to do.

                    But yeah, I was a bit facecious with someone who probably didn’t really know their politics too well. You got me.

                    Username checks out, btw. 🖤❤️

                  • @Woozythebear
                    link
                    24 months ago

                    I think it’s disingenuous to leftists to call liberals leftist. Liberals are right wing and always have been.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, [consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property and equality before the law.

        Wikipedia agrees with me

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It’s a United States thing. They use the term liberal to refer to social liberalism whereas you’re referring to neoliberalism.

          Edit: On second glance, your Wikipedia link is to straight liberalism, which includes things the Republican party doesn’t support, like secularism. So who knows.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            which includes things the Republican party doesn’t support, like secularism.

            Yeah, saw that, too. They are still liberals (as in: support neoliberal policies), but with christo-fascist tendencies. The article states that these points are contended right dow, though.

    • @antidote101
      link
      04 months ago

      Relative to much of the world yes.

      In terms of economics and neoliberalism mostly.

      You’re more right than wrong.

      In terms of social liberalism, the differences between the two parties are more noticeable.

      This is because structural politics is defined by undemocratic means, interests, and forces.

      So we vote on more superficial aspects, such as the culture war and social rights.

      Which can be important, but most of the time aren’t the real meat of the world’s problems.