In a YouTube video, a voice in English announces that China has researched and developed its own ultra-thin 1-nanometer chip – a staggering claim given that the chip isn’t expected in commercial devices for another decade.

“Recent news from China has sent ripples of excitement and astonishment across the globe,” gushes the voice-over on the China Charged YouTube channel. “This revolutionary breakthrough is more than a technological marvel; it is a game-changer that will redefine the global tech landscape.”

“Prepare to have your mind blown,” says another video, this time on the channel Unbelievable Projects. “Welcome to today’s video, in which we’ll discover why America remains behind China in infrastructure development.”

These voices and their “good news” about China are evidence that the Chinese Communist Party and its overseas proxies are using artificial intelligence to flood YouTube with propaganda videos, according to a new report that describes a “coordinated inauthentic influence campaign” on the platform.

  • @Son_of_dad
    link
    English
    985 months ago

    I’d be surprised if it’s just China

    • Transporter Room 3
      link
      fedilink
      English
      265 months ago

      At this point, I assume every major government has the capabilities and the intent to use AI for exactly this purpose.

      Oppose at all fronts you can, this is not okay.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      It’s not. Youtube is full of AI-generated content. Mostly conspiracy bullshit targeted at republicans and other right wingers. But it’s only now when China does it, it makes it to the headlines.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      everyone has massive propaganda departments if they can afford it

      it’s so so extremely useful for driving political support

      the US even has dedicated “Psychological Operations” divisions in the Army

  • nicetriangle
    link
    fedilink
    665 months ago

    The specifics of this article aside, I am so not looking forward to the continued proliferation of AI based bullshit on the internet/public discourse/the media/etc. It’s gonna get so so much worse, we’re just scratching the surface right now. The validity of any photo or video will be destroyed and nothing will be trustworthy anymore. This is great news for fascists who thrive in a world where the truth is unknowable and meaningless.

    • @daltotron
      link
      English
      15 months ago

      It’s just sort of kind of like a slightly more advanced form of spam, or trolling, or really fucked up propaganda/news. The integrity of the ideas and the evidence itself is more what should be evaluated in an argument anyways, rather than the source, and I don’t think like, evidence, generally, like, evidence in general, proof of things in general, is going anywhere anytime soon. I don’t think AI is advanced enough to break encrypted p2p communication, so I don’t really think there’s much of a chance that shit just gets totally wiped off the internet and you start seeing like mass memory hole type shit. It’s more likely that you end up seeing mass disinformation campaigns. You know, like what we’ve had since forever, where you get the population to do it to themselves.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        335 months ago

        > The videos are part of at least 30 channels identified by researchers as being part of the “Shadow Play” network promoting pro-China and anti-U.S. narratives, according to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.

        > according to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute

        > Australian

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Before you get downvoted by the tankies, note for historical accuracy (so that I will be downvoted because they like that even less, OTOH lemmygrad doesn’t even see me so w/e): The massacres were in side streets, not on the square itself. The party was at first split as to how to deal with the protests, the students were to simplify quite a bit Dengists alarmed by the power shifts within the party away from Dengism following Hu Yaobang’s death. Hardline faction was amassing the army outside of Peking, Peking locals went out there and handed them noodles and explanations as to the situation, explaining that the protesters were their sons and daughters, good socialists1, not some bourgeois anti-revolutionary mob. Dengist faction lost out in the internal party struggle, hardliners decided that the army shall march, army marched, Peking locals erected barricades etc. in the streets leading to the square, get massacred, army arrives at square, delivers final ultimatum, students retreat, with no further or at least minimal bloodshed.


        1 According to Marxist-Leninist-Maoist type thought. People understanding actual theory understand that Dengists are even more capitalist than Lenin, but MLs never acknowledge that state capitalism is, indeed, capitalism, and Dengists never acknowledge that they’re not even doing state capitalism any more but run of the mill oligarchic capitalism.

    • @13617
      link
      English
      165 months ago

      Can someone please explain to me the drama of Lemmy.ml and why everyone seems to be leaving it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I don’t know. I just saw a thread there yesterday about “young people are more favorable on China” and inevitably the discussion ended up being largely about the many Chinese atrocities, all of which the mods promptly removed, as well as leaving all the comments claiming that those were all CCP bots coming to…spread anti-Chinese propaganda?

        I dunno, don’t take my word for it, head over to [email protected] and have a look for yourself through the barren comment sections.

        • @Eldritch
          link
          English
          65 months ago

          Lemmy.ml is run by ML. Marxist-LENINIST. They will not allow almost any critique of any government that falls under that umbrella ever. But will gladly hypocritically criticize any western power for the same thing.

          If it was wrong for the US Britain and the west to do it. It’s wrong for China, North Korea today or the Soviet Union in their time to have done it as well. Not a free pass for them to do it. When it comes to anything criticizing their political ideologies you may as well be on something like lemmy.conservative in many ways.

          • CommunityLinkFixerBotB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn’t work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: [email protected]

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 months ago

        honestly they just expect more evidence

        I think they’re not moderated by Americans so their standard for what’s “acceptable” is less “what’s politically-aligned” but “what’s backed by the available evidence”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -195 months ago

        I mentioned EVs aren’t the savior that people are pitching because they still require plastics and rare earth metals and often are fueled by electricity made with coal/oil.

        They got so fucking mad lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          295 months ago

          That has more to do with you regurgitating misinformation, than it does with the Chinese.

          Those arguments have been debunked ad nauseam.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -115 months ago

            It literally isn’t misinformation though? EVs are still polluting. There is no world with cars and buildings without pollution my guy especially now where we are at with technology.

            Nothing has been debunked?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              145 months ago

              It literally isn’t misinformation though?

              It literally is…

              EVs are still polluting

              No one thinks they’re not polluting. Everything you consume is polluting. But EVs pollute significantly less than their dino-fuel-powered counterparts, that’s the point you’re missing.

              • @Sanyanov
                link
                English
                7
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                This debate is clearly one of different goalposts.

                Electric car fans will fairly notice that electric cars are less bad than traditional ICE cars, and therefore the technology is good

                Anti-car folks will also rightfully point out that there’s too much focus on EVs at the time when we should move away from cars altogether, and that electric car future is also very unsustainable, just a little bit less, while giving the false impression of something “green”

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  35 months ago

                  I agree but it’s not a “false impression”. They ARE green. Just because they’re not the most environmentally friendly thing on the planet doesn’t mean they’re not green.

                  I’d be elated if we all moved away from cars but that’s simply not realistic anytime in the near future.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -75 months ago

                Lmfao no I get the point you literally named what I’m saying and gloss over it and this is why this situation we are under is inevitable

            • @sheogorath
              link
              English
              95 months ago

              For the energy source aspect, it’s much more efficient to have a single big place to generate electricity compared to having millions of portable combustion engines running around inside cars. It’s also easier to switch to a cleaner energy if a wind farm or a solar power plant if you’re a state or some entity that’s responsible for energy generation in your region.

              TBH my biggest pet peeve on an EV is basically every EV is a privacy sucking machine. They record everything and send everything home. Give me a car like my old car that doesn’t have any telemetry and the technology is simple enough I can even push start the car when the alternator is fully dead.

              • ComradeSharkfucker
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -6
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                While it is true that a centralized energy source is more efficient and clean it still isn’t enough. Even if every car was replaced by an EV it wouldn’t solve our climate crisis. The only thing it would save is the automobile industry.

                Here’s so info

                And more

                • @TheGrandNagus
                  link
                  English
                  85 months ago

                  Nobody, and I do literally mean nobody, has ever said that BEVs would single-handedly solve climate change.

                  Congratulations on knocking down the strawman you have created.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          145 months ago

          These are conservative talking points that have been repeatedly dispelled. Where are you getting this info from?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -135 months ago

            These are not conservative talking points that’s so disingenuous dude.

            EVs require metals that aren’t really too great to mine for our planet, most of the time that mining requires the use of diesel despite what we wanna believe.

            I’m all for green energy and better awareness of our species pollution but you’re basically being duped by Elon Musk wannabes promising the future that will turn out just like everything Elon does, absolutely trash and we’re gonna wonder why we wasted time with half of this shit.

            The real solution is cars gotta go, public transit needs to be the only transit and parking lots and roads gotta go but the car industry and the infrastructure we invested in is too worth it so we will follow the sunk cost off the cliff and people like you will support it because its slightly better than it used to be even though it is still bad.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              135 months ago

              EVs require metals that aren’t really too great to mine for our planet

              Because drilling and transporting oil is so environmentally friendly? Comparatively it is significantly less destructive. Especially when you look at ocean drilling, which is the majority of it.

              you’re basically being duped by Elon Musk wannabes

              No dude, you are the one being duped by conservative propaganda. My sources have nothing to do with Elon Musk.

              The real solution is cars gotta go

              I mean yes, but now you’re moving the goal posts.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  No your original point was “EVs aren’t the savior that people are pitching”. They are exactly what people are pitching. If you read anything that said EVs were going to save the planet and end pollution, that was conservative strawman propaganda. If you read anything about EVs polluting more because they get their energy from coal plants, that was conservative propaganda.

                  EVs are a green alternative to fossil fuels. If you want to argue that we should get away from cars entirely, I think most here would agree with you, but that’s not what you said.

        • @Tilted
          link
          English
          115 months ago

          Next can you talk about the problem with renewables? Just to come full circle

          • ComradeSharkfucker
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -7
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            That’s quite the conclusion jump. You can be critical of EVs from a leftist perspective even if so much EV hate is from conservatives.

            EVs are an improvement from petrol powered vehicles but they are not in any way good. There is still plenty of pollution from the construction of the vehicle, the transport of materials, the atomized rubber from the tires, and the pollution from it’s energy source (even if it’s less total greenhouse gas emissions as opposed to a petrol based vehicle). EVs will not save the climate even if every car was replaced.

            Here’s more info

            And some more

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -105 months ago

            Nothing is wrong with renewables but you’ve definitely also read about greenwashing right?

            It is basically that. For what people are proposing we need to change the entire economic system away from capitalism and this endless green line go up logic. Until then everything will continue to be this way no matter how we dress it.

            • @voidMainVoid
              link
              English
              105 months ago

              Yeah, don’t try to make anything better. It’s a waste of time unless you’re trying to overhaul the entire economic system.

              What a smooth-brained take.

              • @Sanyanov
                link
                English
                -5
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                The point is that the rise of electic cars slows down the kinds of fundamental shifts and, most importantly, policy changes we need in order to actually get sustainable.

                While it can be seen as an improvement, at the end of the day we end up not taking measures we absolutely should. Everyone is just advertising EV’s as a solution, which they are not. At best, it’s a transient stage before people can finally accept they cannot drive a car in an environmentally friendly way, ever.

        • ComradeSharkfucker
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -15 months ago

          Lemmy.ml got mad about EV hate?? I generally see pretty well informed pro urbanism/public transport takes on there so I’m surprised. Maybe I’m just more used to hexbear

    • AlexisFR
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      Weird, as social leaning instance, they should be opposed to modern China! Should we help them?

    • YeetPics
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Got banned from there today for suggesting that disappearing prisoners isn’t the status quo in “the west”.

      Oddly enough I’ve been downvote-stalked since and I find it hilarious.

  • @Nonononoki
    link
    English
    355 months ago

    Next week: China develops world’s first 0nm chip!

  • @iforgotmyinstance
    link
    English
    355 months ago

    Culturally there is no real concept of plagiarism or cheating in China. Any shortcut is acceptable, because if you aren’t using it someone else is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      Everyone plagiarises until they become powerful enough to influence others to stop or face sanctions.

      Fake it till you make it. Once you make it, call out others plagiarism.

    • Ahri Boy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      05 months ago

      Competition comes with copying some of components. All Android OEMs, including Samsung copy each other.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    305 months ago

    Do people really get their news and information from random YouTube channels?

    YouTube is not a reliable source!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 months ago

      My father in law watches this crap all the time. Also every war propaganda video.

      … if not that, Thai boxing or bear hunting. Ya never know what he’ll be watching as long as it’s one of those. Oh unless it’s Friday night, then he’s watching SmackDown.

      • @Bazoogle
        link
        English
        175 months ago

        The problem isn’t getting your new from YouTube. But rather random YouTube channels. It’s like saying “Do people really get their news from random news sites”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          Yeah it seems a lot of people do. Especially if it’s linked through social media, I would guess a non trivial amount of people won’t fact check it or check the source.

    • @assassin_aragorn
      link
      English
      55 months ago

      I automatically dismiss any argument that uses a YouTube video as evidence. If it’s legit, there’s going to be text that goes with it.

    • 𝐘Ⓞz҉
      link
      English
      45 months ago

      I get mine from Lemmy

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Sometimes I wonder if there are different “levels” of propaganda nation states put out. Like you have this obviously fake crap get a bunch of surface-knowlege people. Then you have more subtle things put out - like social media accounts pretending that something false is a ground truth. You’ll then get people who can catch the fake videos and then believe the fake accounts no problem because it’s obviously can’t be propaganda - because you know what propaganda looks like. cough gell-mann amnesia cough

    Or maybe nation states are really that incompetent and the only level of propaganda they can put out is like the article’s videos. Honestly people give way too much credit to how much these folks know/plan out. There’s no secret cabal playing 5d chess. They’re normal people (ie. dumbfucks) pushing a message.

    Who knows.

    • @Candelestine
      link
      English
      47
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Propaganda is a quantity over quality game. You’re not trying to convince the die-hard supporters of the other side, that’s not realistic. You’re trying to give informational cover to your own side.

      It’s like suppressive fire. Is the machine gunner specifically trying to kill the enemy? No, he’s sending bullets whizzing overhead to change their behavior. Then his buddies can circle around their cover and very specifically aim at and kill them.

      edit: You are right that it’s no 5d chess though. It’s more like the excuses you’d get out of a young kid. Just flak, intended to get in the way. Fired in quantity.

      • @orclev
        link
        English
        225 months ago

        There’s also Russian style propaganda which isn’t really about sending any specific message but more about sowing chaos. It’s about blasting people with so much contradictory information that they become overwhelmed and exhausted and just give up trying to pay attention to anything. To say it a different way it’s about lowering the signal to noise ratio to the point where most people lose the signal.

        China tends to favor targeted disinformation, they tightly control what people hear and have specific messages they push. Russia just tries to scream incoherent gibberish where nobody can hold a conversation anymore.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          175 months ago

          There’s also Russian style propaganda which isn’t really about sending any specific message but more about sowing chaos. It’s about blasting people with so much contradictory information that they become overwhelmed and exhausted and just give up trying to pay attention to anything.

          “Flood the zone with shit”

          — Steve Bannon

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        That makes sense, but the targets of my first paragraph wouldn’t be the die-hards. It would be people who think they can identify fake news - but their hubris is what makes tricking them even easier. It would actually be much easier making fake accounts than making the fake YT videos.

        If I was to use your analogy - it’d be like if the gunner’s level of effort to land hits or to whiff were the same. [S]he’d obviously just hit them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -15 months ago

      There’s also the crap “China will collapse in XX days” propaganda on YouTube as well

      It’s fucking everywhere

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 months ago

      at this point I’m convinced China was just copying all of the “China gonna collapse in 3 days” videos

    • @Bazoogle
      link
      English
      95 months ago

      The AI is just being used to create the content itself. The upload process is still just a script. The AI can only adjust parameters set by the person, and the person creating the setup likely isn’t adding in any of the other factors

    • @Evotech
      link
      English
      85 months ago

      An actual AI influencer who could control all that would be interesting. What kind of strategies it would make to get the most engagements

      Very Hard to train since I assume you would need real human feedback for each run of course

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    205 months ago

    Alarming as this may sound, they’re beating a dead horse. Most of the people who would believe this shit uncritically also think Fox “News” is the gospel truth. They’re already lost.

    • @occhionaut
      link
      English
      35 months ago

      Yeah ive blocked every channel reccomendation ive gotten that so much as smells like shoe polish.

  • that guy
    link
    English
    195 months ago

    Give them a break they don’t have a 24 hour cable news channel for propaganda

  • ripcord
    link
    fedilink
    125 months ago

    Why is this a sign that they’re using “Artificial Intelligence”? Sounds like they’re just as likely using text-to-speech for planned propaganda. It’s not like they don’t have an ay of people to work on it.

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Because contemporary tts use ml, a form of ai.

      tl;dr: AI is creating the voices, not the script.

    • @Grimy
      link
      English
      65 months ago

      AI hate gets people emotional and leads to more clicks. Couple that with anything to do with China and you end up with a couple bucks of ad money.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This made me think of what you can do with AI to poke fun at china, and sadly it seems that microsoft is a bit hard on anti china prompts. But like, life finds a way…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    105 months ago

    They do it here too. Anything positive coming out of china is full of this shit and bootlickers quick behind them.

  • froggers
    link
    English
    95 months ago

    What’s next? They landed on the dark side of the sun? North Korea already did that.