• @SinningStromgald
    link
    1804 months ago

    Referring to himself and the Ugandans there as “we,” Walberg asked, “Whose side do we want to be on? God’s side. Not the World Bank, not the United States of America, necessarily, not the U.N. God’s side.”

    So he doesn’t stand with the USA? Sounds like he needs to be removed from Congress.

    • @A_A
      link
      47
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yes, … or he needs to be removed from modern USA and stay in Uganda

    • @Seleni
      link
      244 months ago

      ‘The UN God’s side’? What kind of lunatic nonsense is that?

      • @SinningStromgald
        link
        304 months ago

        I think it’s one of those funny situations where putting the periods in the abbreviation for “U.N.” means no period at the end of the sentence.

        • @agent_flounder
          link
          English
          34 months ago

          Along with God being capitalized wherever it appears in a sentence. E.g., it would also have been clear if it has said, “…U.N. We are on God’s side.”

      • @die444die
        link
        English
        24 months ago

        If there was a god, this guy would already be dead and roasting in hell.

    • pewter
      link
      134 months ago

      Removed from Congress? That practically sounds like renouncing your citizenship.

      Going to another country to oppose your own country is atypical.

    • UltraMagnus0001
      link
      64 months ago

      hmm, Jesus once said lest judge each other and kill them if we don’t like them. Praise Be.

  • @TommySalami
    link
    604 months ago

    Walberg explicitly encouraged Uganda’s leaders to resist opposition to the law from the U.S.

    Can US representative just blatantly undermine US foreign policy, or is this one of those things where it’s wrong but won’t be pursued in any official way?

    • BeautifulMind ♾️
      link
      English
      114 months ago

      Can US representative just blatantly undermine US foreign policy, or is this one of those things where it’s wrong but won’t be pursued in any official way?

      Well, there’s the the Logan Act [18 U.S.C. § 953], which on its face seems to make that sort of thing illegal:

      Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

      Buuuut: there appears to be no history of prosecuting people under this act despite it being enacted for 200 years, so don’t expect it to be enforced

      https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/RL33265.pdf

      • @TommySalami
        link
        3
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think it was the Logan Act I was thinking of! Thanks!

        Disappointing that it’s never been enforced. While this scenario is not the makings of an diplomatic crisis, it seems a pretty cut and dry example of what the Logan Act seeks to block. It’s a U.S. rep blatantly pushing acting against US diplomatic interests.

        I think it would be utter chaos, but I’d love just a single solid year of throwing the book at obvious illegal behavior no matter how trivial. Put the fear of God in some of these morons.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Put the --fear of God-- respect for the equal application of law in some of these morons.

    • ██████████
      link
      -1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Believe it or not uganda is a Major immigator to the EUA right now. And i am a communist but dang man women from africa are like the hardest customers in the world. Marry one snd youll never pay full ever again

  • @captainlezbian
    link
    334 months ago

    I generally oppose the death penalty, but in his case I’ll make an exception.

    • @Betch
      link
      144 months ago

      My thoughts exactly.

    • @chiliedogg
      link
      24 months ago

      Given the context, I’m gonna ask you to follow that thought up with a hair more clarity on who you’re thinking deserves the death penalty?

      • @captainlezbian
        link
        34 months ago

        US politicians who go to other countries and campaign for vulnerable groups to be executed for things that aren’t even crimes in their home country.

        • @chiliedogg
          link
          14 months ago

          Good choice. The other one would have been bad.

      • Melllvar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        He wants people like me to be executed for existing. It would be rude not to reciprocate.

        • @chiliedogg
          link
          14 months ago

          The article is about a politician supporting a law that carries the death penalty for homosexuals, and I responded to a comment that said they’d support the death penalty in this case.

          Which case? Evil politician supporting genocide, or merely being gay?

          • Melllvar
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            In “his” case, not “this” case.

            • @chiliedogg
              link
              24 months ago

              Oh.

              It’s amazing how much difference one letter makes.

  • @RampantParanoia2365
    link
    154 months ago

    Cool. So naturally he’s been placed under arrest for enabling human rights violations.

  • @Mamertine
    link
    144 months ago

    I wonder how many male prostitutes he had sex with while there.

  • @TheJims
    link
    144 months ago

    Is every Republican in congress. A slimy shit weasel? Is there at least one that isn’t a total fucking degenerate with any redeeming qualities?

    • @RapidcreekOP
      link
      -2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Hold on…I’m thinking

      Got one!

      Senator Lisa Murkowski