• @realitista
    link
    711 months ago

    Why not do this for Ukraine, who is in way more need?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1311 months ago

      the specific political mechanism in question only relates to sales of arms, not donations.

      This is not a comment on whether that’s good or not, simply that they are different political processes.

      • @realitista
        link
        311 months ago

        Thanks for clarifying, I didn’t know that.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The State Department has also used the emergency provision at least two times since 2022 to rush arms to Ukraine for its defense against Russia’s invasion.

    The United Nations Security Council this month adopted a resolution that called for more aid to reach civilians in Gaza but, to gain support from Washington, stopped short of imposing a cease-fire.

    The State Department’s move is certain to anger some Democratic lawmakers, who have criticized the Biden administration for unconditionally supporting a war in which Israel has killed a large number of Palestinian civilians, following terrorist attacks by Hamas.

    Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, asked on social media early Saturday why the administration would bypass congressional authority on weapons sales to any nation.

    The Department of Defense said in a statement on Friday that Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken had “provided detailed justification to Congress that an emergency exists that requires the immediate sale” to Israel.

    The war started on Oct. 7 when Hamas launched cross-border attacks in Israel, killing at least 1,200 people, according to the Israeli authorities.


    The original article contains 498 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!