President Biden is heading to North Carolina on Thursday to announce $82 million in new investments to connect homes and businesses in the state to high-speed internet.

He will go to the Raleigh-Durham area in the critical battleground state to make the announcement, alongside Gov. Roy Cooper (D). The funding comes from the American Rescue Plan, which was the COVID-19 relief package Biden signed into law in 2021, and aims to connect an additional 16,000 homes and businesses in North Carolina.

The investment, according to a fact sheet from the White House, will also create jobs in manufacturing and construction to produce “Made-in-America fiber-optic cable that will build out internet infrastructure across the country.”

  • @800XL
    link
    5510 months ago

    And they’re still not going to get it. That money is going straight to internet provider exec bonuses and reported profits.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4810 months ago

    We don’t want 82 million in giveaways to Comcast.

    We want public Internet that is free to users and run by the government

    • @CluckN
      link
      810 months ago

      $82 million goes to Comcast

      Comcast fires 20% of staff

      Delays rollout by 3-years

      Asks for more funding to complete project

      • @fxt_ryknow
        link
        110 months ago

        I feel like we’ve seen this show before…

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
      link
      610 months ago

      Ding ding ding. I’ll gladly open a holding company and promise to bring high speed internet to the masses. All I need is $82M in funding from the government. Then I’ll delay the installation by 20 years, lay off staff in those 20 years, give myself an $82M bonus, then say I need more funding with a renewed promise to bring high speed internet to the masses. Lather, rinse, repeat. It’s a tale that has been going for as long as ISPs have existed.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      then you want a congress that will pass a bill and approve that

    • bean
      link
      -4
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Free, and run by the government sounds like ‘highly regulated and restricted’ to me. Like they would have any reservations on sucking up everyone’s data.

      Edit: Downvote me all you want, but remember Snowden and the NSA.

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        i mean exactly considering that republicans are literally trying to do that with kosa, which republicans are admitting is just to censor lgbtq content.

        • bean
          link
          110 months ago

          Not really anymore. Browser tracking through fingerprinting is quite effective.

  • @numberfour002
    link
    1910 months ago

    I’m not here just to be a contrarian, but I really don’t fully agree with some of the hot takes in these comments. So here’s my perspective:

    I’m in a rural area and because of this type of funding, I have decent high speed internet. The same can be said for my neighbors, some of whom didn’t have internet until very recently because the options weren’t really viable or reliable.

    I get that this is a wonderful opportunity to sling vitriol at the government AND businesses. I get that there were spectacular failures in the past. But the reality is, like usual, more nuanced than that.

    A lot of this type of money has, and likely will be, used to support building infrastructure for rural areas that would otherwise not be economically viable for companies to provide that kind of service to. Living in a rural area, I’m not convinced that many/any people are going to change their vote to Biden because they suddenly have access to (or promises of future access to) fiber internet. I’m also not convinced that Biden and his administration would have any reasonable expectation otherwise.

    Additionally, I’m sure some of this money will go to the big corporations and directly into the pockets of the top execs. However, it does provide work and jobs for regular “commoners” as well. It’s also the case that the big players aren’t always the ones getting that money. A lot of this type of money is going to replace copper infrastructure with fiber, and a lot of the work is being done by smaller / regional companies because they’re the ones who have been operating these areas all these years while the big players focused on the most profitable areas with the higher returns on investment.

    Of course, feel free to aimlessly hate on the entire system, but at least do so knowing that this type of thing IS helping real people and that if/when they see these types of comments, it’s pretty clear that folks are being unrealistic and dogmatic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Will there be any rule changes/enforcement to keep ISP’s from dividing up territories into regional monopolies?

    I have two AT&T fibers running under my front yard, but they’ll only offer me a dial up connection. Spectrum cable is my only real option, and they keep raising the price.

    My problem has nothing to do with a lack of infrastructure and is clearly the result of collusion that is supposedly illegal.

  • @Daft_ish
    link
    1310 months ago

    “Thanks,” said the cable companies as they start shopping for new yatchs.

  • @TheDeepState
    link
    510 months ago

    Let the brides begin! It’s campaign season!

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    310 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    President Biden is heading to North Carolina on Thursday to announce $82 million in new investments to connect homes and businesses in the state to high-speed internet.

    The funding comes from the American Rescue Plan, which was the COVID-19 relief package Biden signed into law in 2021, and aims to connect an additional 16,000 homes and businesses in North Carolina.

    The investment, according to a fact sheet from the White House, will also create jobs in manufacturing and construction to produce “Made-in-America fiber-optic cable that will build out internet infrastructure across the country.”

    Biden will give remarks and discuss his goal to connect over 300,000 more homes and businesses to high-speed internet by the end of 2026, through a total of $1 billion from the American Rescue Plan.

    Biden’s remarks will highlight his so-called Bidenomics agenda, which is his economic plan to build the economy from the bottom up and the middle out.

    Trump also won the state in the 2016 election, beating former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.


    The original article contains 305 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 45%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    -310 months ago

    Why he’s doing this:

    Former President Trump beat Biden for North Carolina in 2020. Trump also won the state in the 2016 election, beating former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

    All this stuff coming out now is just token measures to make it look like he’s helping people so they vote for him.

    And sure, they’re better off than if nothing was done, but it’s going to be obvious for voters they’re only getting attention because an election is coming up.

    Trying to help them the whole term and not just pre election would get a lot more votes, and help a lot more people.

    But would be a bigger hit to donors pocketbooks.

    The article is light on details too, so I suspect most of this money is going to telecoms again for them to run the fiber, and like every other time we’ve given them money, they’ll likely just keep it and not do anything

    • Flying Squid
      link
      1610 months ago

      Presidents do this every time they’re up for re-election. This is nothing new. Of course they’re going to pander to states they want to win.

      • @WhatAmLemmy
        link
        610 months ago

        The kleptocracy already paid billions for high speed broadband infrastructure. Telcos stole the money, delivered nothing, and the kleptocracy kept giving them money.

        What’s changed?

        • Flying Squid
          link
          710 months ago

          I have no idea what changed. I didn’t say anything changed. I said he was pandering to the state, which is just what presidents do when they want to win a state and they’re up for re-election.

        • @givesomefucks
          link
          English
          -310 months ago

          I think this will be the third time, but maybe the fourth? I’m not sure why it’s expected to work this time. Maybe Biden even knows that but just wants the optics? I don’t know what would be worse honestly.

          And yeah, if we’re subsidizing this states internet bills…

          The providers are just going to raise the price by that much in a year or two anyways.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        -210 months ago

        Sure it doesn’t work and voters have wised up to it… But this is what we always do so we’ll keep doing it even tho it doesn’t work!

        You know what we haven’t tried and will likely work?

        Actually putting the work in and trying to help Americans the entire term and not trying to only do the bare minimum for appearances to trick people into thinking they’re being helped…

        At least that way, even if we don’t get the votes, we’re helping people.

        For fucks sake, the most common reason most non voters have given for decades is that neither party legitimately wants to help them, they just get tossed crumbs before an election, and that’s only if they live in a battleground state.

        This shit isn’t complicated. It’s just helping Americans makes donors unhappy, and Dems consistently underestimate how much voters can see thru this pandering.

        • @Candelestine
          link
          English
          610 months ago

          What do you call a nation-spanning infrastructure bill? Or offering cash payments to low income families so their kids can buy food in the summer?

          I’m all for criticizing Biden, but it should be honest criticism.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          510 months ago

          Voters have wised up to it? Do you have any actual evidence of that?

          • @givesomefucks
            link
            English
            010 months ago

            Yeah, election results…

            In addition to surveys of non voters.

            I get a random person on social media not knowing that, but our president and his campaign team should.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              510 months ago

              Please present this evidence. Just saying you have evidence is not actually having evidence. I would like to see these surveys and how they show that voters have wised up to political pandering.

              • @givesomefucks
                link
                English
                -3
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Politics is simply not the way to make change, they said. Two-thirds of nonvoters agree, for example, that voting has little to do with the way that real decisions are made in this country; they are 21 points more likely to say so than people who voted.

                A majority also said they believe it makes no difference who is elected president and that things will go on just as they did before. Nonvoters were 29 points more likely to say that than people who voted. (Read more about why they didn’t vote, in their own words.)

                And

                Nonvoters are also more likely than voters to say that traditional parties and politicians don’t care about people like me; the mainstream media is more interested in making money than telling the truth; the American economy is rigged to advantage the rich and powerful; success in life is pretty much determined by forces outside our control; and to feel that most issues discussed in Washington don’t affect them personally.

                https://www.npr.org/2020/12/15/945031391/poll-despite-record-turnout-80-million-americans-didnt-vote-heres-why

                The article already says NC voted trump the last two elections, and I already quoted it…

                So I’m going to assume you don’t need another source for that

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  310 months ago

                  Well I’m going to need a source for why non-voters matter to a president when pandering to a state. They weren’t going to vote anyway.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          010 months ago

          Just because you only pay attention around election time does not mean Biden has been doing nothing this entire time… that doesn’t make any sense. Like he hibernated through the term and only just now regained consciousness to campaign again?

          This reeks of both-sideism. Please compare the platforms and policies of the two sides you seem equally disillusioned with.

          • @givesomefucks
            link
            English
            -110 months ago

            No, I have been paying attention…

            One of the biggest criticism of Biden s early years, was that he appeared to have no plan when he took office. He didn’t have anything ready to go, and said he would start to look into his various campaign promises.

            And before that was done, we lost the House.

            This reeks of both-sideism

            Republicans are a lost cause.

            If the only standard for the only other option is “not republican” then we, as a country not just a party, are completely fucked.

            1/3 of this country doesn’t vote, moving further right for decades isn’t working. It’s time to go back to FDR style Dems when Republicans could only manage to win two states

            https://www.270towin.com/1936_Election/interactive_map

              • @givesomefucks
                link
                English
                010 months ago

                Benefit of the doubt that’s true and he did get some stuff done that was substantial:

                Is it enough to offset alternating with Republicans?

                Moderate progress only works if it’s steady. Ten steps back and five steps forward is still moving backwards.

                If moderate progress is the most we reach for, we’ll never make any progress on a long time scale when modern Republicans get equal turns.

                And the way to prevent that, is trying for faster progress. The party just won’t try that, because their donors don’t want it.

                Bringing us alllll the way back to 1/3 of voters just not voting.

    • @SinningStromgald
      link
      310 months ago

      The article is light on details too, so I suspect most of this money is going to telecoms again for them to run the fiber, and like every other time we’ve given them money, **they’ll likely just keep it and not do anything **

      That is the real problem, the government throwing money at Telcos and expecting them to do something other than line their bottom line.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        -210 months ago

        A cynic would say Biden knows this and is trying to get in with giant telecos and trick voters.

        Although it would be even worse if he legitimately expects them to go or their end.

        Considering Biden legitimately ran his last primary on his ability to cooperate with Republicans…

        There’s a pretty good chance he’s not smart enough to see this coming. If he is, then he’s still just lying and doesn’t see an issue with that.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      i mean it’s actually part of the infrastructure bill that was passed earlier but go off i guess