Did I do it correctly?

  • @someguy3
    link
    English
    2311 months ago

    This was funny at the time, but kinetic weapons will always have a place. See Rods from God.

    • directive0
      link
      English
      11
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Babylon 5 knew what was up.

      • @someguy3
        link
        English
        511 months ago

        Can you fill me in?

        • directive0
          link
          English
          811 months ago

          In Babylon 5 an alien race destroys their enemy’s homeworld with “mass drivers”. Ship mounted mechanisms that accelerated captured asteroids towards the surface of the planet, completely decimating it. In the show they are regarded as heinous weapons of mass destruction for their merciless destructive power.

    • Dr. Bluefall
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      Wasn’t this commenting on specifically propelling kinetic projectiles with explosives?

      • @someguy3
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Gunpowder. Yes in most cases you have to propel the object. What I’m saying is the physics of kinetics are there, that really can’t be forgotten.

      • @Landless2029
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Even if they made some kinda super condensed handheld railgun it would’ve also worked the same.

        The propellant doesn’t matter. The payload does. Idk why they didn’t think of kinetic force vs energy. Since they absorbed energy.

        Hell they could’ve done some kinda sound based shockwave.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 months ago

      Cool idea, but shipping anything to orbit is insanely expensive and those are almost impossible to aim accurately. At least with the current technology.

      • @someguy3
        link
        English
        911 months ago

        Did you see the ships they have in Stargate?

      • @Senshi
        link
        English
        6
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        What makes you think targeting would be an issue? The idea of kinetic orbital impactors is to not rely on an atmospheric glide for reentry, but to brute force straight through the atmosphere to maximize impact velocity and thus energy.

        This means you speed up the impactor tremendously, e.g. with a rocket, and ram it straight down. The atmosphere is only 100km thick, and only the last 30km even have any meaningful density to offer noticable resistance. Yes, the impactor will create a massive plasma plume, but it won’t even have enough time to heat up itself, much less ablate or disintegrate before impacting the ground.

        Targeting such a device would be extraordinarily simple with incredible accuracy.

      • @AnUnusualRelic
        link
        English
        111 months ago

        Also dropping something inert from orbit with any degree of accuracy would probably be extremely difficult.