• palordrolap
    link
    fedilink
    149 months ago

    Picture this: The Magritte painting depicted here with the apple replaced with a poop emoji, and the whole painting with the caption Mashitte.

    Now that I’ve typed this out, I’m not sure I like the idea, but it would still be art.

  • Mister Neon
    link
    139 months ago

    This comic makes me sad. Magritte is great, but I don’t know where, “The Son of Man” is located. Every time I search the only thing I find is “Private Collection”.

    • @Viking_Hippie
      link
      119 months ago

      Correct me if I’m wrong here, but I THINK that might mean that it’s located in a private collection.

    • @Buddahriffic
      link
      99 months ago

      Well it’s not in my private collection, so now you have one less place to look.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Wait, the picture painting of a guy with apple in face really exists?

      Here, print it out. Originals are only for making money anyway.

      • Mister Neon
        link
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I highly encourage you to seek out the original paintings and other artistic mediums in museums when you have a chance. It’s not about prestige, authenticity, or clout. It’s about gazing upon relics that have somehow survived the test of time and gleaming a bit of the creator’s intentions and skill. It’s a human connection that can stretch the breadth of millennia.

        Also I used to fix printers so now I have undying hatred of them. I buy quite a few art books though.

        Edit: One thing photos, digital image files, and other means of reproduction of most paintings never seem to get right is the texture. Remember a painting is not flat, it’s still a 3rd dimensional object. Painting techniques can layer paints giving them texture, it’s a visual quality that is hard to appreciate when not in person.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        Or Pictures at an Exhibition (wikipaedia link) by Modest Mussorgsky?

        (Especially the Emerson, Lake & Palmer version) (Youtube link)

        In the UK at least, “Picture” is totally fine shorthand, even today, to refer to a flat 2D thing that might be put on a wall in a gallery, whether it be a painting, drawing, photograph etc. More formally it would tend towards being a figurative (rather than abstract) work.

    • @Jerb322
      link
      69 months ago

      The whole thing is drawn, how can you tell it’s not a picture?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        69 months ago

        Because it’s a representation of an actual painting, but if we’re going to be overly semantic then I give up. You win

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It’s light traveling from your phone to your eyeballs.

            Then it’s neuronal signals to your brain.

            OMG it’s abstraction all the way down, isn’t it!? :-P

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              Those neurons are cells and they need the mitochondria which uses protein to make energy… so everything is just energy in some form or other

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29 months ago

                And energy in turn derives from the sub-atomic level, which itself sits on top of the quantum, although some people say that it is all oscillations of n-branes… therefore do any words ever have any meaning, really, ever?:-P

        • @BlackPenguins
          link
          39 months ago

          It happened! Someone said someone else won on the Internet.

    • @Buddahriffic
      link
      39 months ago

      I’m not sure I like the picture you’re trying to paint with this comment.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    79 months ago

    Great, this finally explains why there’s a difference between “a” and “the”.

    The question is incorrect. He should’ve asked “can I take the picture”. And would’ve obviously received a no.

    I don’t go to parties.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        I don’t see any other pictures in picture. Although, given the context of an art gallery, this would probably make sense.

      • @Buddahriffic
        link
        149 months ago

        Even if there is only one picture, it is still a picture, so the question is still grammatically correct. It’s just deliberately ambiguous. I am taking this stand.

        Knocks over a statue and walks away with the stand