• GrappleHat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I love the idea! $8.99 per month is a bit steep…

    EDIT: Thinking more about the price, Mozilla is mostly funded by Google but this is a blatantly anti-advertising/anti-Google move. Mozilla must be trying to establish a new revenue stream to get themselves independent of Google. It’s a balls-y move!

    If I’m correct in that thinking it does help justify the cost and put it in context.

    • Dran
      link
      English
      503 months ago

      I have to imagine that most of these data brokers don’t have automated ways to remove information, it’s probably designed to be as annoying as possible to prevent people from doing it en-masse. If someone on mozilla’s end has to fill out a form and mail it and deal with ~200 brokers worth of constant intentional subtle constant changes (designed to break automation) to try and make services like this harder, the $9/mo seems almost reasonable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        103 months ago

        pushes glasses up nose Ackchually…

        The recent CPRA regulation in CA has essentially mandated automated data deletion requests. Technically it only applies to CA residents, but it’s so hard to disprove residency that most companies will process requests from anybody.

        It only went into effect last year, but yeah - everybody I’m aware of has implemented an api for processing requests.

        I think $9/mo is pretty fair to cover paying for the engineering and infrastructure to support their ongoing integration efforts.

        That said, you could absolutely build something yourself that sends automated requests to every data broker you can find, but… Mozilla already knows where they are and will be looking for more. It’s going to become a game of whack a mole as companies that haven’t received deletion requests will have more complete (and thus more valuable) data sets.

        If you don’t want to just leave it on though - just this a couple times a year as a sort of spring-cleaning event should cut down your presence on ad rolls significantly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        I have Incogni and they have a “compliance score” for each. I highly doubt any of it is manual (besides initial research & setup) considering there’s 120+ brokers listed on my dashboard and they send follow-up and re-requests when necessary

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      113 months ago

      I mean yeah they can’t make everything free you know. Its good they are making services and I will be happy to support them!

    • @MrMcGasion
      link
      103 months ago

      8.99/month seems mostly competitive to Incogni which is a similar service that costs 12.98/month (they’ll give you a 50% discount if you buy a full year at once, which works out to 6.49/month). Although with as many sponsor spots as I see Incogni buy from YouTube creators, they are probably flush with investor capital, and trying to get as many subscribers as they can, before slowly “raising” their prices by offering fewer discounts.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The price isn’t unheard of, but it’s got plenty of competition. A few competitors from AlternativeTo:

      Service price/year
      EasyOptOuts $19.99
      Optery $39.00 - 249.00
      PrivacyHawk $74.99
      Incogni $77.88
      OneRep* $99.96
      Mozilla $107.88
      DeleteMe $129.00
      PrivacyBee $197.00

      * Mozilla is selling a repackaged version of OneRep, charging more per year but a little less per month

      Mozilla also has at least one product in their toolbelt that gives them the ability to resell private data to ad brokers, and it’s managed by the same DPO as other Mozilla products…

      Category of data Mozilla sells to…
      Browsing history Advertising partners
      Search history Advertising partners
      Your device’s precise location Advertising partners
      Records of personal property, products or services purchased, obtained, or considered Advertising partners
      Other purchasing or consuming histories or tendencies Advertising partners
      Inferences drawn from other personal information to create a profile Advertising partners

      I wonder… If you sign up for this service, will Mozilla opt you out of these sales?

    • @macattack
      link
      33 months ago

      Yeah that’s a bit pricey for me. I might pay for one month a year or something like that…

  • @sramder
    link
    163 months ago

    Site feels deceptive.

    Big box: Enter your email for a free scan!

    Hit big blue button that says “Get free scan!”

    Next page is enter your password to create a free account.

    :-(

      • @sramder
        link
        03 months ago

        Not really in this case. It’s for the free one-time scan, I wasn’t signing up for the service.

        I like the idea of this sort of thing, but it always ultimately comes down to placing some kind of trust in the data brokers. This seems foolish to me because they clearly have no interest whatsoever in complying with this sort of thing unless they are forced to.

        Hell, if I were a proper scumbag I’d make harvesting the information of people who requested it taken down my business. Exclusive demographic, low cost business model ;-)

        Hopefully Mozella have thought of this and mix a bunch of trash data with their searches and requests… or some other scheme to minimize the impact of “bad actors” in the data harvesting industry.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      i mean it’s just your firefox account, which you presumably already have

      • @sramder
        link
        33 months ago

        I probably should but I don’t. Firefox is strongly associated with my nostalgia for a time when few things required one.

    • @Mr_Blott
      link
      -23 months ago

      Nice, 8.99/mo is just greed. I’d happily pay a one off though, even as a donation

      • Jaysyn
        link
        fedilink
        103 months ago

        It is a little pricey, but as another poster mentioned, Mozilla is probably trying to ditch Google & needs new revenue streams.

        The thing I hate about it is, this is a service we shouldn’t need at all.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73 months ago

    Either this hasn’t launched yet or it’s for the USA only, since the links just take me to the regular Mozilla Monitor service.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      “At launch, the Monitor Plus free scan and paid subscription service will be offered to people based in the United States.”

      We’ll have to see how long it takes to spread elsewhere.

  • Venia Silente
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    inb4 “buT M0zILlA sHouLd fOCuS oNlY iN ThE brOWsEr!!!1111”

    Also:

    $8.99, which is effectively $9, which is effectively $10

    At that price it better all of it goes to the effort and not of it to the CEO.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13 months ago

    Sounds good for users who care about privacy, but couldnt continue reading because…da fuk! I hate subsctiptions. Im probably mad for no reason lol

  • The Giant Korean
    link
    English
    13 months ago

    I paid for the yearly subscription to support Mozilla.