• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    167 months ago

    I oppose Poilievre being in government.

    It’s hard to understand why his opinion should carry any more weight than mine.

  • kbal
    link
    fedilink
    137 months ago

    So many words on this topic, so few of them addressing the obvious questions about why doctors might have a use for “puberty blockers” or what legitimate basis politicians could possibly have for wanting to abolish them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yes. So upon seeing that headline, my first thought is that “for kids under 18” is rather suspect phrasing. Like someone wanted to get “kids” in there no matter what.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    97 months ago

    The decision to use puberty blockers should be based on a conversation between a young person and their doctor, Boissonnault said.

    “I don’t see M.D. after Pierre Poilievre’s name or Danielle Smith’s,” he said. “So, not their business.”

    THIS RIGHT FUCKIN HERE