US concerned NASA will be overtaken by China’s space program::undefined

  • veee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15510 months ago

    If they were truly concerned, they’d start giving it the funding it deserves.

    • @WhatAmLemmy
      link
      English
      128
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      They’ve tried everything except actually funding NASA, and they’re all outta ideas.

      NOTE: China WILL overtake NASA, the same way they are dominating the renewable energy sector — because they invest heavily in science, and they do it early. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand this shit.

      • DigitalTraveler42
        link
        English
        4910 months ago

        But hey we tried giving a shit load of money to a billionaire space nazi instead!

        • toiletobserver
          link
          English
          1610 months ago

          Won’t someone think of the investors!

        • @assassinatedbyCIA
          link
          English
          410 months ago

          Maybe we need to give more to the space phallus that the other asshole billionaire built. Maybe that’ll fix it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -710 months ago

          Unfortunately that company is the best hope we have to stay ahead. With their low cost they can monopolize the worldwide launch market(except Russia and China). So that funding, strategically, must continue.

          What should also happen is funding spacex competitors, so we stay on the bleeding edge.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            English
            610 months ago

            Is China staying on the bleeding edge by funding a bunch of private companies?

      • /home/pineapplelover
        link
        fedilink
        English
        710 months ago

        Maybe we should give money to fund education and research instead of banning books and attacking each other.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2410 months ago

      I came here to say exactly this.

      Perhaps a space race with China would rekindle the motivation for our money grubbing demagogues to actually fund it.

      • @orclev
        link
        English
        1810 months ago

        No, it won’t. They’ll just relocate to China, or maybe a super yacht out in international waters. They’ll continue milking every last cent out of the US until it’s a dead dried up husk of a nation and then they’ll just move to the next one. Their supporters are too stupid to realize where the end of the path they’ve been told to walk is going to take them, and they’d rather blame anyone else but themselves for all the problems they face. So no, a space race with China won’t fix shit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          610 months ago

          Judging by the state of the US, you’re much more likely to be right than I am, you cynical bastard!

          😂

    • @ChicoSuave
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      So expect a big increase in private space missions

  • FartsWithAnAccent
    link
    English
    111
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Gee whiz, maybe we should have been properly funding our space program all of these years instead of wasting it on making the military industrial complex filthy fucking rich and the world less secure overall?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5910 months ago

      Especially stupid considering last time they gave the space program appropriate funding, it led to a lot of advancements that the military industrial complex could use.

      • @Windex007
        link
        English
        2310 months ago

        You make it sound like the military advancements were an unexpected byproduct, as opposed to the real goal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2610 months ago

          The goal was optics. Kennedy didn’t know what advances would result from Apollo. He wanted to show that the US was better at science and technology than Russia.

          • @Windex007
            link
            English
            1410 months ago

            The science of putting a ballistic payload anywhere, including heaven.

            The space race was awesome because it let the two countries measure their dicks (specifically their military dicks) without actually obliterating the planet.

            The “for all mankind” angle was a great way to frame things for the population of Earth, for sure. But just like mobile chemical WMD labs in Iraq, sometimes the given justification and actual justification are two different things.

            Don’t get me wrong, there absolutely were beneficial optics. Something doesn’t have to just be for one thing. But it was always primarily about practical demonstration of weapons capacity under the facade of human exploration.

            • RedFox
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              I don’t disagree, but has anyone found corroborating evidence or documentation, past speculation and reasonable assumption?

              • @Windex007
                link
                English
                110 months ago

                No, I don’t think anyone has definitely proven that George W Bush and Colin Powell KNEW that the WMD claims in Iraq were bullshit when they were presenting them as the primary justification for the war.

                It’s just the nature of the beast.

              • RedFox
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                Ha, I was actually taking about the space program, but same for the invasion. Although, I feel like more people have come forward about the invasion being BS than early space program stuff.

      • FartsWithAnAccent
        link
        English
        910 months ago

        Nonsense, surely their shortsightedness will pay off in the long run!

    • @ChicoSuave
      link
      English
      1810 months ago

      People behind the scenes are siphoning NASA space research money and turning it into space profit instead. The growth of private space companies starting in the US is no coincidence. Blame oligarchs for steering the country into a dead end.

      • @Jarix
        link
        English
        810 months ago

        Hate on spacex and its competitors as much as you want, im not saying you dont have cause.

        But defunding NASA caused this. Those billionaires looked and said holy shit, the entire nasa budget is only that much? And they arent building rockets anymore? I can literally fund my own space program? Ide be crazy not to

        • TurtleJoe
          link
          English
          410 months ago

          The government has funded SpaceX, not musk.

    • @grue
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      To be fair, it’s not as if those things are mutually-exclusive. For example, you know how the Hubble Space Telescope is this extremely unique and nigh-irreplaceable scientific instrument that cost a pretty big fraction of NASA’s entire budget?

      Well, it turns out we actually have dozens of the damn things; it’s just that we couldn’t be bothered to actually point more than one of them away from Earth instead of towards it.

      Hell, a decade ago the National Reconnaissance Office gave NASA a couple for free 'cause they just had 'em lying around, but (as far as I know) NASA hasn’t managed to scrounge up enough money from the couch cushions to spruce 'em up and launch 'em yet.

      • FartsWithAnAccent
        link
        English
        310 months ago

        They certainly don’t have to be, but there is a well established pattern of the US government getting waaay too chummy with corporations to the point that it can undermine what’s best for the people in pursuit of corporate interests.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6610 months ago

    US: continually decides to not fund scientific exploration of space

    Also US: GUYS! BE AFRAID! ANOTHER COUNTRY DID DECIDE TO SPEND MONEY ON IT! NOW WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO IF…UM…WELL, I GUESS IF THEY TAKE OVER SPACE…? Or…wait, what are we concerned about? Ah, fuck it. Cut NASA’s budget again. We got genocide to fund and taxes to cut for the wealthy.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      English
      510 months ago

      Same with Republicans and the border.

      “Do something about the border!”

      “Ok, we need funds. Please give them to us.”

      “No! Do something about the border!”

      “We can’t because you won’t give us the money.”

      “Too bad! Do something about the border!”

      • @Nudding
        link
        English
        210 months ago

        Didn’t Biden agree with those idiots that the border is the most important issue of the day?

        • Flying Squid
          link
          English
          410 months ago

          Probably. I don’t remember. I do remember them screaming that something has to be done about the border, then the Democrats gave them virtually everything they asked for on the border and Biden said he would sign the bill, but then Trump told them not to agree to it because it would hurt his campaign and they shot down the bill that would have given them what they wanted.

          And the really sad part is that half the country, at least half the country, doesn’t even know.

          • @Nudding
            link
            English
            -510 months ago

            Yep, you have a ghost president calling the shots for half the elected representatives, and the current president condoning a genocide. Really no winning.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              English
              610 months ago

              Remember when you just told me that I support genocide by existing because I haven’t rioted?

              Maybe you aren’t the best person to be talking about this. Because apparently you think around 8 billion people support genocide.

              • @Nudding
                link
                English
                -810 months ago

                I’m sorry that you’re having so much trouble with this thought process. Good luck with the genocide.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  English
                  310 months ago

                  I’m not having any trouble at all. You believe my lack of death means I support genocide, unless I do the things you’ve said. And since you claim I already support genocide, you must know for a fact that I didn’t do those things you said.

                  Therefore, I support genocide by existing.

                  Are you going to pretend you didn’t write what I pasted above?

                  Honestly, I’m just waiting for you to tell me to kill myself. That’s the next step.

                • @orrk
                  link
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  my god, like, could you stop using the genocide logic to do this shit? you see “the people in Gaza deserve to be targets of a genocide because they didn’t rise up against Hamas”

        • @UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          English
          -110 months ago

          Yes. And now we’re going to have two senile coots yelling “He let the illegals in!” back and forth at one another as we stumble into another national embarrassment of an election season.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    English
    5810 months ago

    Huh. I wonder if funding NASA better might help, Republicans?

    • Red Army Dog Cooper
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1510 months ago

      They are likely going to fund it less and give more and more of its mission over to space force and private companies is my guess

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        That would also work.

        The only thing that won’t work for space is the thing we’re doing now:

        • Maintaining a vice-like government control
        • Using that government authority to choose not to move forward

        Progress only stops under a narrow set of conditions that need to be actively implemented by the government. Progress is actually natural, and progress stopping requires enormous centralized effort to interfere with people getting things done.

        • Red Army Dog Cooper
          link
          fedilink
          English
          610 months ago

          I disagree privitizing space will do absolutly nothing but lead to balooned costs and stagnation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -210 months ago

            Theoretically private programs would be an increased cost over a NASA only program since private companies want a profit margin.

            But Congress being what it is tends to require NASA programs to create jobs in a lot of different voting districts across the country which leads to an insane amount of inefficiencies.

            We can’t have nice things because of pork barrel politics.

            • Red Army Dog Cooper
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              Private Companies however have no insintive to actualy innovate, if you look at them they are all taking decades old NASA and USSR Space program tech and resuing it … and callling it innovation

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                I’m sorry… this is not true lol. You know what SpaceX is up to, right? At the least, but there are tons of interesting and innovative companies. I mean hell look at Stoke Space

    • @FordBeeblebrox
      link
      English
      1210 months ago

      If we fold it into the space force and say it’s for targeting woke weirdos…we’ll get a billion dollars through congress by tomorrow

        • @FordBeeblebrox
          link
          English
          410 months ago

          Intelligence that doesn’t come from jeebus?! They’ll burn that ark before it leaves the ground

          Search for god or his patio or whatever…now you’ve got Midwest money

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            410 months ago

            “Search for extraterrestrial divine intelligence” or “a strategy to get closer to God through space colonization”, say, a Stanford torus in some L point (that’s so expensive that it ain’t gonna happen, but they’ll also be very excited, I think).

      • Flying Squid
        link
        English
        510 months ago

        We could just say the “anti-woke” part and not even bother with the space force part and that would probably work.

        The woke boogieman is the biggest thing to scare them in years.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -310 months ago

          The woke boogeyman scares us because it, itself, is a set of false threats that are distracting us from real threats.

          Like, we’re worried about war, a shifting global power structure, the degradation of systems of detente that keep the worst in humanity from emerging, and the woke crowd wants us to treat the feelings of exclusion of trans people as the most important threat on the board.

          The woke movement is a boogeyman movement, and that’s why we treat it as dangerous. The woke movement is a push to get new boogeymen added to our threat list and moved to top priority over things we know will actually kill us.

          And thing that really, really scares us, is that the system that has proven to be the salve for the ills of massive unleashed violence, the system we call free market economics, is being targeted by the woke crowd because they refuse to read the history of the things they’re proposing. They’re all like “we don’t want people to suffer so let’s abolish private property”. That’s like saying “we don’t want people to drown, and people tend to drown when they’re near boats, so let’s destroy this boat we’re all in, to prevent drowning!”

          It’s terrifying to us because there are serious things to be afraid of, and the woke movement is asking us to ignore or even embrace those things.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            English
            110 months ago

            There is no “woke movement.” That’s exactly why you’re scared of a boogieman. They don’t exist either.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      810 months ago

      Instead, I think we should defund China.

      rapturous GOP applause and cheering

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      English
      410 months ago

      Switch the funding for the MIC and NASA for one year. We’ll have fusion power cracked in 5.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3310 months ago

    One can only hope.

    The last time that happened, we explored the moon and developed the space shuttle program. We got microchips and memory foam.

    Ideological rivals encourage congress throwing money into big science. Apollo returned $14 on the dollar. It’s a good investment.

  • @lemmus
    link
    English
    2810 months ago

    Choosing Musk and SpaceX for Artemis is likely NASAs biggest mistake.

    • @ChicoSuave
      link
      English
      1810 months ago

      It was always part of Musk’s plan to cripple NASA funding and pump that money into SpaceX.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1610 months ago

      If you look at the Artemis mission and think starship is the weakest part of the plan, you are simply not being objective.

    • @ikidd
      link
      English
      -810 months ago

      SpaceX has launched more successful missions this year than every other space agency put together.

      Fuck Musk and all that, but if you’re posting this bullshit, you have Musk derangement syndrome.

    • @gaifux
      link
      English
      -2410 months ago

      NASA is a fraud. Musk is just the latest goofy face of govt black projects. Keyfabe

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2010 months ago

    Have they considered renaming it X and firing all their expert staff to make NASA more profitable?

    • FartsWithAnAccent
      link
      English
      40
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Only if the US actually competes. Given the fuckwits in congress, that is far from assured.

      • @unphazed
        link
        English
        210 months ago

        “Can you give me one bill…”

  • Gazumi
    link
    English
    1710 months ago

    Who would have imagined that decades of funding cuts and pressure to rely upon Musk would allow another nation to take the lead? (Sarcasm)

  • Rin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Dang maybe we should take a fraction of the trillions we spend on the military to fund scientific research, and also health and education while we’re at it so we’d get even more potential scientists.

  • @flop_leash_973
    link
    English
    1410 months ago

    I’m sure throwing more money and contracts at Musk and SpaceX is going to help solve the problem any day now. /s

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1110 months ago

    Export all your technology and jobs to cheaper labour to make more profit. Now you will slowly become bankrupt, as no one can afford the enshitification products and services.

    • @ripcord
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      Enshittification doesn’t just mean “things get worse”

  • @Filthmontane
    link
    English
    910 months ago

    Looking at their space station, I think China already has overtaken NASA.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      Their station has like three modules (with plans to add 3 more) and capacity for 3 people. The ISS has at least 16 modules (maybe over 30 depending on what you count as a module) and capacity for over a dozen people.

      Like many things from authoritarian countries, it looks nice but isn’t even close in terms of capabilities.

      • @Filthmontane
        link
        English
        110 months ago

        Authoritarianism is not equal to capabilities. In fact, the Soviet space program was significantly more capable for a very long time

  • @mlg
    link
    English
    910 months ago

    So they had no issue relying on Russia to service the ISS ever since they shutdown the space shuttle, but now they’re afraid of China… doing space science faster?

    Ignoring the fact that this is not even a real concern, maybe don’t spend morbillions on free munitions for Israel or Lockheed’s next stupid idea.

    They defunded NASA so hard that they started hallucinating about going back to the moon with 15% of the Apollo budget.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      At the time, Russia wasn’t as……problematic. We had been working with Russia as an International Partner since the very early days of ISS and even during Shuttle/Mir.

      Obviously they did become problematic, but we didn’t have other options until SpaceX. Now that’s….obviously got its own issues, but Russia is vastly different than China when it comes to space. Russia needs the money, China already has it.

      • @N00dle
        link
        English
        310 months ago

        The fact that NASA had to rely on Roscosmos in the first place is shameful. It highlights long standing issues facing the space program. I think some of these problems trace back to the cost of the ISS. It’s been hard to convey the importance and investment into the future the station provides.

        For China their station provides proof of concept that they can achieve similar results one day both to themselves and the world watching.

    • @N00dle
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      The amount of money spent on Apollo was insane. A reduced budget should have been sufficient. It’s just been weighted down by shit cost-plus contracts and the abomination that is SLS.

      The fear of China here is that they are basically single handedly their closest competitor. They’re the only other nation thats managed a Mars Rover landing, building space station, and have their own plans for Moon and Mars with taikonauts( astronaut equivalent) on the ground in the future.