SpaceX’s Starlink user terminals are being openly sold in Russia, though CEO Elon Musk has denied knowledge of any such sales in the country.

The terminals, which link users with the Starlink satellite constellation are available on the Chinese company DJI’s website in Russia.

The Shenzhen-based firm is better known as one of the world’s leading drone producers. Soon after Russia began its February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, DJI announced it would temporarily suspend business in both countries pending “compliance assessments.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Damn, I liked DJIs products.

    Guess that’s another one to add to the blacklist.

    Also; I find it impossibly unlikely SpaceX has been entirely unaware of these terminals being active in Russia. They can identify the location of any active terminal via the satellite constellation and either gps or simply triangulation of the signals.

    • @Raiderkev
      link
      English
      159 months ago

      I’m sure they were selling them drones too.

    • @Madison420
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      If it comes from China it’s hitting the shade at some point my friend the difference is in how much.

    • @SupraMario
      link
      English
      -69 months ago

      Not easy to do when they’re being used in Ukraine. Especially if you have trenches a few hundred yards from each other.

      • FenrirIII
        link
        English
        89 months ago

        They would have used them in Russia at some point prior to actions in Ukraine. Plus, if they were sold to a Chinese company, they would be tracked and expected to be in China.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          79 months ago

          And that opens up another box of questions.

          Why are the starlink satellites of Russia active at all? The amount of non Russian customers with legitimate use for Starlink would be a very very low number.

        • @QuaternionsRock
          link
          English
          5
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          They would have used them in Russia at some point prior to actions in Ukraine.

          Why?

          Plus, if they were sold to a Chinese company, they would be tracked and expected to be in China.

          True. It would also be easy enough to set up a whitelist by cooperating with the Ukrainian government. Alas, the temporary blackout last year made it obvious where Musk’s intentions lie in regard to Russia.

        • @SupraMario
          link
          English
          -19 months ago

          This makes no sense, they don’t need to set them up in russia. You can transfer your starlink account to anyone, you don’t need to be in the country you bought it from.

          • FenrirIII
            link
            English
            19 months ago

            Every company tracks where major hardware is shipped and the intended country of use. A company like Starlink definitely would because they need to know demand per region and support requirements in that region.

            • @SupraMario
              link
              English
              -19 months ago

              They did, when it was shipped to China, why are you assuming they don’t know where these are? They do, but it’s not easy to figure out if it’s the UA using them or the russians because the fighting is so damn close to each other.

  • BarqsHasBite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    339 months ago

    I am Jack’s complete lack of surprise.

    (Well actually I’m surprised it’s DJI, they could actually face sanctions if the US wanted to. I wouldn’t be surprised if it were a pop up shop.)

    • @Aqarius
      link
      English
      -39 months ago

      Sanction how? Both sides are buying all the Mavics they can get their hands on. DGI is the bell of the ball.

  • @NegativeLookBehind
    link
    English
    199 months ago

    So now we can pinpoint the Russian outposts when the terminals make contact with the satellites?

    • @Death_Equity
      link
      English
      229 months ago

      If Starlink will provide location information in a timely manner, which I don’t have much confidence in.

      • gullible
        link
        fedilink
        129 months ago

        But… but musk said that starlink isn’t meant to be used for WAR! He surely wouldn’t lie in order to attempt to spin his intent to prolong the war and sell to the other side through an intermediary!!!

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      59 months ago

      Not with Elon running things considering he decided not allowing Ukraine to quickly win the war would start WWIII.

      • @NegativeLookBehind
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        No Such Agency surely has a…workaround…for gathering the data.

  • Flying SquidM
    link
    English
    99 months ago

    When Elon dies and all the truths come out, I guarantee you we will find out that he was fully aware of this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Wait does this mean they are cloned like every other Chinese factory made product? Are they made in Chinese factories?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Nope, they are official resellers for China (and Mongolia?)

      Edit; which in my view makes it worse, Elon probably wanted this to happen…

      • @Bassman1805
        link
        English
        219 months ago

        ITAR is pretty direct about these situations: if you sell to a 3rd party and that 3rd party sells to an ITAR-restricted country, you’re gonna get investigated HARD.

          • @Bassman1805
            link
            English
            39 months ago

            I don’t know the specifics of how it applies to Starlink, but I work in telecom and just about everything I do is ITAR controlled. I don’t even make the telecom devices, just equipment to test them.

  • @michaelmrose
    link
    English
    29 months ago

    Terminals are uplinks to remote resources. They would be at minimum be able to see the terminals being used to connect to Russian VPNs and note that they are being used in areas controlled by Russia that are not contested. Our lawmakers must compel them to turn over the entire internal communications to a special master to determine what they knew about this and when and decision makers including Musk must be summoned to congress. When not if it is discovered that they were aware or willfully blind prosecutions for treason should begin. In between A and B the entire operation should be seized and operated by the US army.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29 months ago

    As someone considered a “foreign person” in the context of these export regulations…

    ITAR! ITAR! ITAR!

  • @clearleaf
    link
    English
    -79 months ago

    OH NO ITS ALL OVER SAVE ME JESUS

    I’M SHITTING MY PANTS I’M SO SCARED OR MAD OR WHATEVER AAAAAH