• @stickmanmeyhem
    link
    889 months ago

    No platform pays nearly as well as YouTube does on average. If they upload to other platforms, and you watch the content on those other platforms, they’re going to make significantly less money than if you watch on YouTube. Even if there’s increased reach from uploading to multiple platforms, the creator will almost certainly make less—so there’s less than no incentive for them to upload elsewhere.

    • @NateNate60
      link
      599 months ago

      I believe Nebula pays fantastically well, at least according to Sam from Wendover Productions. This is attributed to the fact that Nebula charges a subscription and half the subscription fees are divvied up to the channels according to watch time.

      However, he owns a significant portion of Nebula so he’s not a disinterested information source.

      • @stoly
        link
        179 months ago

        Nebula was also made by content creators in response to how bad YouTube is for them.

      • @SquiffSquiff
        link
        39 months ago

        My annual subscription to Nebula expired last month. I didn’t renew. They seemed to have a mix of exactly what you get on YouTube and some peculiar TV documentaries that weren’t quite good enough to make brand name TV channels

        • @NateNate60
          link
          49 months ago

          I don’t think that from a purely “rational consumer” perspective Nebula is worth the $30 per year demanded. But to me, it’s like a Patreon subscription. I can support my favourite creators and I get some nice perks in return, like offline video downloads and advertising and sponsor-free programming. These perks are not worth $30 a year to me. But I will continue to support them anyway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        I’m broke, so if they exclusively upload to nebula, they aren’t getting anything from my view because it doesn’t happen.

        Uploading to both though seems like a good idea

        • @NateNate60
          link
          69 months ago

          There are original series on Nebula that cost a lot to make so I understand that they need to recoup the investment on those.

          But most videos are released on both platforms. The Nebula versions usually have extended cuts and are free of adverts and sponsors, but the programming is otherwise the same.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        159 months ago

        Yeah, Vimeo completely pivoted to basically being a white label video platform for business websites.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      49 months ago

      Also, YouTube is a removed to run, hardware wise, they must have farms upon farms of servers everywhere, on top of CND infrastructure. Do not envy their bandwidth bill. Few out there can or could compete, even if they wanted to.

  • @PoliticallyIncorrect
    link
    37
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    99% of the times when something like this happens it’s about money, so just follow the money…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    239 months ago

    One reason could be difference in how much the other platforms pay vs YouTube. Uploading multiple places also requires more effort and coordination, might not be worth it from their perspective…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      69 months ago

      I know that Peertube doesn’t have any built-in monetization right now, so they would probably be relying on viewer charity to make money on some platforms.

      • mesamune
        link
        English
        39 months ago

        Some do but it’s an agreement with their uploaders and the instance owners.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          Interesting. I know that most Fediverse stuff doesn’t allow ads on the platform, so do the creators just get a cut of any money donated to the instance?

      • @yamanii
        link
        -19 months ago

        Yeah not happening, I have like 300 channels on my subscriptions.

    • Multiple major YouTubers would need to migrate simultaneously and make the new platform the only place to access their content before the viewers necessary for monetary gain move. And that is not likely to happen.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        59 months ago

        And the new platform would have to aggressively monetize its users, which is kind of the reason for avoiding YouTube.

  • Adrien_0715
    link
    fedilink
    109 months ago

    Not enough people to watch. But even on Youtube, only shorts can get views better than the regular videos. Most people don’t search for content and they don’t like ads.

    • Jeena
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      Even if you try to search for content otside of youtube, it’s very difficult to find.

  • @blackfire
    link
    39 months ago

    Brodie still uploads to odysee.

  • Melkath
    link
    fedilink
    09 months ago

    What platforms?

    For months, on the YouTube app, 95% of my videos play for 5 seconds, then skip 10 seconds, then play the rest of the video.

    It is ABSOLUTELY INFURIATING.