• Pope-King Joe
        link
        English
        53 months ago

        Terryology has got to be one of the most nonsensical and unhinged pointless maths theories I’ve ever read.

        • @mumblerfish
          link
          23 months ago

          At times I just thought he did not believe in anything beyond the integers, which would be insane enough. But it is so much worse.

    • @jettrscga
      link
      11
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      4/2=2, upside down.

      (1/4) / (1/2) = (1/4) * 2 = 2/4 = 1/2

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Imagine a pizza. The pizza is 1. You cut the pizza into three slices: two slices are 1/4 (0.25) of the size of the pizza, the other slice is 2/4 (0.5) of the size of the pizza. We’ll ignore one of the 1/4 slices for this question, as we don’t need it.

    Compare the 0.25 slice and the 0.5 slice, this problem is essentially asking “how many times can I fit the 0.5 slice into the 0.25 slice?”, the answer to this is obviously… 0, if you’re thinking in integers. Okay, but how much of the 0.5 slice could you fit in…? Half (0.5) of it. So 0.5 fits 0.5 times into 0.25.

    Half of the slice that’s twice as big as the 0.25 slice fits into the 0.25 slice.

    Edit: Gone back and read other comments and… Holy shit y’all, have some compassion for people who struggle with maths? Nobody is helped or motivated by snarky comments. A concept that is easy to grasp for you might be difficult to understand for someone else for a variety of reasons. Somewhat relevant xkcd.

    • @danekrae
      link
      43 months ago

      Are you going to eat that last slice?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        You can have it, but then everyone has to scale the other two slices by 1/0.75 since they now make up 100% of the pizza.

    • @Mr_Blott
      link
      23 months ago

      Phwoar you must be really clever

  • @MrJameGumb
    link
    113 months ago

    That doesn’t make any sense to me but the calculator says it’s correct… Goddamit I’m going to be thinking about this all day now…

    • HEXN3T
      link
      fedilink
      223 months ago

      Divide with a decimal to multiply. This is equivalent to multiplying 0.25 by 2.

    • @bitwaba
      link
      8
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s confusing because it’s dividing by "one over two (a half)" instead of dividing by "two over one".

      Dividing by 2 is the same a cutting something in half.

      Dividing by a half is the same as the inverse of cutting something in half, which is doubling it

      • Altima NEO
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Ah yeah, thats where I was mentally fucking it up. Thanks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      Maybe you’re interpreting it wrong. With addition and subtraction we can imagine objects increasing and decreasing in quantity.

      However we cannot multiply or divide an object to make more or less of that object. Instead it’s more like creating territories on an object for microbials to fight over.

    • myxi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      0.25 / 0.50 = (0.25 * 4) / (0.50 * 4) = 1 / 2 = 0.50

    • Xero
      link
      English
      -23 months ago

      If this doesn’t make sense to you, you’re in desperate need to repeat elementary school

  • @LemmyKnowsBest
    link
    83 months ago

    💚 Half of a quarter is…half.

    ♥️ …is half of what?

    💚 is half of a quarter!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    63 months ago

    X ÷ (number bigger than 1) < X, obviously

    X ÷ 1 = X, obviously

    X ÷ (number smaller than 1) > X, somehow confusing?

    How many halves go into a quarter? Half of one.

  • Xero
    link
    English
    13 months ago

    As an Asian, I can’t understand why this keeps you up at night. Didn’t you learn this in like 2nd grade?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They didn’t teach why. American mathematics have been a rote learning exercise in classrooms for generations past.