2024 will be known as the year of the return.
😂
Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t Nintendo HAVE to sue for IP infringement or lose control over their IP? If I remember correctly, Japan has some fucked up IP laws.
Short answer, no. Long answer, also no.
You need to defend patents and trademarks, else you lose them. You don’t have to protect copyright- works you create are yours, indefinitely (creator’s life plus 70 years plus some company still exists plus whatever BS Disney comes up with next). Piracy certainly doesn’t involve the first two, at all.
If Japan’s IP laws are f’ed up, it’s because it supports “holders” too much, enables patent trolls and gives corporations too much power.
No. The only case where you can lose “IP” (a deliberately misleading term that lumps together several completely unrelated legal constructs, none of which are property) is in the case of a trademark being diluted to the point that no reasonable person can be expected to know it’s a trademark. Things like heroin, trampoline, escalator, dumpster, dry ice, etc. That’s it. Copyrights and patents, which are different things from trademarks, aren’t lost until they expire.
It depends!
“Preservation efforts” 😂
The game mentioned in the lawsuit is quite new and still being sold. I doubt over a million people were playing it to “conserve” it.
This is a troll account above, just a PSA before anyone thinks they’re going to be able to engage in thoughtful debate
I’m new, you piece of shit. Nice aggressive community you got here.
Feel free to fuck off, then
Eat my ass
You realise this is satire?
Yes, but the news story and the community reaction it’s based on is real.
I just read it. I can’t even see a game mentioned. What are you going on about?
Satire is usually based on real life…
Nintendo cited Tears of the Kingdom in their lawsuit. Not in the article.
Ok. But the article is satire. The reason Nintendo sued is obviously not to enshrine people’s name for game preservation… that’s the joke.
deleted by creator
Nintendo also didn’t sue every single person involved in video game preservation. Thatsthejoke.jpg
The “community reaction” you’re referring to doesn’t exist. People by and large are saying “no surprise, they did it while the console was still on sale, and they tried to make money doing it”.
Wrong comment my guy
You were exactly the one I meant to reply to. You’re criticising what is clearly a joke as if it were a real position and inventing controversy with a scarecrow argument.
The downvote squad doesn’t care about facts
oh lol he’s banned
Ignorant AF take
