I know that Boeing’s on everyone’s shit list these days, but the company doesn’t even make aviation tires. Unless a failure in one of Boeing’s systems caused tire damage this is probably due to poor maintenance by the airline, or a defective tire manufactured by Goodyear, Michelin, Bridgestone or Dunlop.
Boing makes the plane. If they choose to contract out portions, they are responsible for managing the subcontractors; which includes quality control.
No, they literally might not have installed this tire. It’s like blaming Toyota for a flat on your 2010 Corolla.
It’s telling that they’ve got their reputation at the point where any time there’s a problem with an air plane people assume it was them.
Well, it is their planes.
They have a responsibility to make sure that the parts they use function appropriately.
No disagreement on that.
I was about to ask. We’ll have to wait for information on which component failed here.
If all Boeing planes are questionable, it’s reasonable to ask what the US government will do about it. They’re the definition of too big to fail, but at the same times lives are very directly in the balance.
The core issue causing the quality control issues with Boeing is actually that they are outsourcing more and more of the design and manufacturing of their planes, and then squeezing their contractors, knowing that their contractors don’t have any other options, aerospace is both regional and consolidated. Boeing will gladly point out whenever there is a failure that it is the fault of the contractor that designed the relevant part or system, but it’s generally not that the contractor was incompetent, but rather that they were given an unreasonably tight budget and forced to deliver something.
but the company doesn’t even make aviation tires.
It’s my understanding that a lot of Boeing’s woes come from outsourcing and not verifying that parts are up to snuff.
WendoverProductions did a great video on why Boeing sucks these days. They essentially cut as many corners as possible and are still looking for more to cut.
The Boeing CEO at one point even said he succeeded in his goal of making Boeing profit-driven instead of engineering-driven.
These problems will only get worse as the disparity in wealth continues to grow.
In this case the tires may have already have been replaced by the airline multiple times. Blaming that on Boeing is ridiculous.
I thought i just had to avoid getting on a Boeing, now i have to watch out for the ones in the sky?
Let me guess, an air wave hit it?
Chance in a million
It’s been towed outside the environment.
Well, the tire’s not supposed to fall off.
So you’re saying there’s a chance!
Why is everyone so obsessed with this? Should not be a surprise: You all know Boeing was named after the sound of falling parts hitting the ground, right?
Ah of course, like the Boeing ball.
God these airline companies need a overhaul. stop stuffing the flights and make them a few inches more roomy. stop cutting corners. offer good refund policies and shit. they are such bastards
Boeing has had issues for a while. I work in commercial aviation certification and all the senior engineers I work with are ex-boeing guys who took the early retirement plan some years ago when it was offered. According to them anyone who knew anything left and the competition from Airbus has forced them to attempt to speed up the certification process. The FAA gets final approval over new airplane designs but more of the engineering review and approval comes from a private ODA, which Boeing has their own. You have a company despite for sales who can “approve” their own designs. There is definitely corporate pressure forcing approvals to go faster.
Nationalize them.
SF Chronicle: “You’ve got an ad blocker installed”
Inspect element: “This is not the ad blocker you’re looking for”
Disabling JavaScript fixes 95% of these issues too.
16 year old video, wow
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
I want to know how many people believe that’s real.
Hoffe jemand hat aufgepasst.
There’s a lot of crapping on Boeing here, and don’t get me wrong, they’ve earned the criticism. However, I’d be very surprised if this incident wasn’t actually traced back to maintenance issues with the airline.
If course, that was also my thought when i first heard about the plug door, and it lasted up until I learned the plane was so new it likely hadn’t even been through it’s first A check.
Flying is the safest way to travel is what the airlines want you to think Hank!
Well, at least it wasn’t the front that fell off. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m5qxZm_JqM
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/watch?v=3m5qxZm_JqM
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Shocker that quality took a dive when Boeing stopped using North American labour to build their planes in favour of developing countries.
Lol what? The merger with the McDonnell Douglas Corporation (defense contractor) and continued focus on cheaping out on R&D costs, especially safety related tests, while maximizing investor payouts has way more to do with the quality of their planes than where they’re manufactured.
Quality took a dive when Boeing merged with McDonnell-Douglas.
Their corporate culture overtook Boeing’s engineering one.
The joke goes, “McDonnell-Douglas bought Boeing with Boeing’s money.”
I imagine you think quality planes are still riveted together by the hand of a team of buxom broads.
No, Quality was when the wing struts were made in Canada with a single, massive CNC mill. Not in a developing country by near-slave labour.
