• Rev3rze@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 year ago

    A brick is more aerodynamic than a Wrangler. Fun fact about bricks: they’re rock types but some dedicated trainers have been known to make their bricks use the Fly move without ever using the HM.

    • EdibleFriend
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Irish Pokémon trainers have been known to use rock types against English trainers.

  • Blackout@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I drove a jeep for 10 years. Terrible commuting/travel vehicle. The entire vehicle is a wind break as illustrated. You go above 70 and it’s as loud as a jet inside. Very stiff clutch that made switching gears in traffic unbearable. Only good thing was the indestructible i6 engine but they got rid of that in 07. Still had use in socal with the soft top but I don’t know why they would be popular in colder, less mountainous places.

  • randomdeadguy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    What if the Bulbasaur was the size of a Wrangler? What are the aerodynamics of a Venusaur?

    • Everythingispenguins
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Aerodynamics are independent of size. Drag goes up or down with size but the aerodynamics stays the same.

        • Everythingispenguins
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your welcome. A simple way to think about is a truck makes a few hundred horsepower but literally has the aerodynamics of a brick. Where a 747 needs hundreds of thousands of pounds of thrust, but that fucker can fly.