“it’s ok, but have you considered–”
goes on to suggest creating a completely different thing
Have you considered answering this other question that would take three years and six figures of funding to complete? Maybe just add that to the paper quick with the next revision.
Or
Have you considered mentioning this barely relevant subject in the discussion, in particular this aspect, which has a recent paper you can cite? Totally not mine by the way, I am very anonymous. But this should definitely be mentioned.
Pretty sure that’s referee 2
That suspiciously phallic sword made me glance towards the 3d printers…
It’s called a bollock dagger and, yes, it’s really phallic especially when holstered at your waist.
Looks like a Boeing whistle-blower, and clearly those wounds are self-inflicted.
Hey, I know a guy who looks just like that. There are many people who would like to do this to him.
Saint: … I’ll take that as a ‘no’
St Peter the Martyr!!
