Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says he will hold up a $1 trillion “minibus” spending package that needs to pass by the end of the day Friday to avoid triggering a partial government shutdown.

“I will hold it up primarily because we’re bankrupt and it’s a terrible idea to keep spending money at this rate,” Paul told The Hill on Wednesday.

“The spending bills before us will lead to a $1.5 trillion deficit for the year. We’re borrowing about $1 trillion every three months. It’s an alarming pace of accumulation of debt,” he said.

“My opposition to this will be based on how much” the package would add to the U.S. debt, which now stands at $34.5 trillion, he added.

Asked if he would delay final Senate passage of the bill past the weekend, which would trigger a partial government shutdown, Paul shrugged and lifted his palms to the air, signaling he hadn’t decided yet how long to delay it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    93
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    He couldn’t run fast enough to give the billionaire class 1.5 trillion of our tax dollars in 2017 under the Trump administration. That alone exploded our debt even more than Reagan did. That’s quite the accomplishment.

    Oh, and our taxes go up this year and keep increasing. The billionaire classes’ never will.

  • partial_accumen
    link
    793 months ago

    “My opposition to this will be based on how much” the package would add to the U.S. debt, which now stands at $34.5 trillion, he added.

    Hmm, why could be a cause of this?

    “On December 22, 2017, President Donald Trump signed into law the so-called Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), a $1.9 trillion tax bill favoring corporations and wealthy Americans.” source

    And who approved this legislation?

    source

    Senator Paul, you have much to be blamed for in causing this.

    • @Wrench
      link
      103 months ago

      Anyone have that first graph in a dollar amount? Seems odd to display that as a percentage.

    • @khannie
      link
      English
      33 months ago

      Wow that first graph really tells a story. That’s a great post. Thanks for taking the time.

  • Neato
    link
    fedilink
    English
    493 months ago

    Ok then. Slash the military budget and give half that money to the IRS with directives to go after the rich tax dodgers. Oh no, that isn’t what you meant Rand?

  • @MegaUltraChicken
    link
    443 months ago

    Alright someone text his neighbor, he knows how to deal with Rand Paul.

  • NataliePortland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    333 months ago

    Why is it always Rand Paul? The poor man does not understand how spending and taxation work.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      463 months ago

      He does understand, but he is a malicious jerk who wants all the tax money to benefit the wealthy so he lies about things to get his way.

      For example, cutting taxes on the wealthy and then using the lack of funding to deny benefits to the less fortunate.

    • @Boddhisatva
      link
      163 months ago

      He’s just doing Putin/Trump’s bidding as usual.

  • @Viking_Hippie
    link
    203 months ago

    “I will hold it up primarily because we’re bankrupt and it’s a terrible idea to keep spending money at this rate,” Paul told The Hill on Wednesday.

    Just in case anyone wondered whether the guy named after a fraud beloved by total morons (Ayn Rand) BY a fraud beloved by total morons (Ron Paul) is still being a fraud appealing to total morons by pretending that he doesn’t know the difference between a national budget and a household budget after 13 years as a senator.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      the guy named after a fraud beloved by total morons (Ayn Rand)

      “Rand” is a short form of “Randal”, his full name. His father didn’t name him after Ayn Rand.

      • @SkyezOpen
        link
        -33 months ago

        Nah, I read somewhere that his dad loved ayn rand and male prostitutes.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    113 months ago

    You can’t spend the money and then decide you don’t want to pay the bill. Not how it works.

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      Their primary candidate is currently attempting to prove you wrong on a “few” different fronts with a “handful” of court cases.

  • @3volver
    link
    103 months ago

    Yea, for all the people who think the senate is necessary, here you go. 2 senators per state is why we have to deal with this bullshit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    don’t blame me, I’ve never voted for this carpetbagging asshole who is using our seat to grandstand for an office he is never going to win.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says he will hold up a $1 trillion “minibus” spending package that needs to pass by the end of the day Friday to avoid triggering a partial government shutdown.

    “I will hold it up primarily because we’re bankrupt and it’s a terrible idea to keep spending money at this rate,” Paul told The Hill on Wednesday.

    Funding for the departments of Defense, Labor, Health and Human Services, State and other federal agencies will expire at 11:59 p.m. on Friday.

    The Kentucky lawmaker said he would seek to amend the package, which was crafted by a small group of congressional leaders and senior appropriators after negotiations with the White House.

    Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), another prominent conservative, is urging colleagues to vote against the bill and its numerous expected earmarks, which are technically banned under the Senate GOP conference rules.

    Ignoring this truth has contributed to our $34 trillion national debt,” Lee posted on X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter.


    The original article contains 311 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 47%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!